Maybe over Mueller/Marksberry, I could see that. He is Cooper's best player, period. I still think he's better on OFF. though.

 

I agree about Watson. I def can see him playing at the next level. I do believe he is better on the offensive side of the ball.

I agree about Watson. I def can see him playing at the next level. I do believe he is better on the offensive side of the ball.

 

Complete agreement on this.

I think that's a pretty good list! I liked the Winkler kid from SK. How big is he?

I think that's a pretty good list! I liked the Winkler kid from SK. How big is he?

 

6'2" 195ish

6'2" 195ish

 

Jack Telek of Highlands. Injured 1st scrimmage of year and out.

Young man to watch for the future class 2017. Gage Tucker. Oline and Dline . 6'3 305 at 14 years old. Probably another year out from being recognized. But is starting varsity on both sides of the ball. Scott high school 5 A this year, 4A next 2 seasons.

Did you see what Slusher did against Cov. Cath this past weekend on Off. and special teams? Watch the tape, then get back with me. NO way he's a better LB, then receiver, NO WAY!

 

Calm down Amijo, it's an opinion. Yes I did see the game, but if we are evaluating on just one game a lot of kids make the list. I've been to two games and watched Saturday's. He has been consistently dominant as a LB in every game I've watched. That was the first game he stood out as a WR. Stokes and #6 have been more consistent. Heck, Studer is a great WR, he's done more too. Brett would make my list, but on D. Didn't realize only your opinion counted.

At CB you have to include sophomore Trent Kincaid from Simon Kenton. Has 5 interceptions, and 1 fumble recovery.

Seems to at least get a hand on every ball thrown his way. Also several tackles.

What about Robinson dl at highlands. If you have murrer on the list then Robinson should be brought up because he tore him up when they played.

What about Robinson dl at highlands. If you have murrer on the list then Robinson should be brought up because he tore him up when they played.

 

I'd won't disagree with this, but it's Johnson of Newport, Machlitt of Dixie and Johnson of Dixie and everybody else.

Calm down Amijo, it's an opinion. Yes I did see the game, but if we are evaluating on just one game a lot of kids make the list. I've been to two games and watched Saturday's. He has been consistently dominant as a LB in every game I've watched. That was the first game he stood out as a WR. Stokes and #6 have been more consistent. Heck, Studer is a great WR, he's done more too. Brett would make my list, but on D. Didn't realize only your opinion counted.

 

I think most, if not ALL the people on this board would say Slusher is a better receiver then LB. Even Coach Rash would agree with this too. It's not just me, Malibu. We get it you're a Beechwood guy, there are other schools, with players, that have better LB's, just sayin.

Edited October 8, 201411 yr by Randy Parker
Rule 2

My biggest problem with putting him in the top 26 is, he had 10 rushing yards against Campbell Co. and ONLY 5 rushing yards against SK.

 

He barely played through the first qtr in SK game, non-district and saving him up for district matchups. Also have to factor in the linemen for these performance as both opposing teams were larger. Another thing to consider is he was pulled early for at least two games due to Cooper leading by a substantial amount.

But as stated to each their own, and I think Watson could start on both sides, but I'm a "homer" though I do recognize good talent on any team

Calm down Amijo, it's an opinion. Yes I did see the game, but if we are evaluating on just one game a lot of kids make the list. I've been to two games and watched Saturday's. He has been consistently dominant as a LB in every game I've watched. That was the first game he stood out as a WR. Stokes and #6 have been more consistent. Heck, Studer is a great WR, he's done more too. Brett would make my list, but on D. Didn't realize only your opinion counted.

 

I agree 100%.

He is a stud at LB and Stokes and Burns have been more consistent at Wr.

I agree 100%.

He is a stud at LB and Stokes and Burns have been more consistent at Wr.

 

This is still the TOP 26 players in NKY thread right? Stokes and Burns, again nice players not top 26 level, sorry. That's what this tread is about, the best 26 players at each position, in NKY.

Calm down Amijo, it's an opinion. Yes I did see the game, but if we are evaluating on just one game a lot of kids make the list. I've been to two games and watched Saturday's. He has been consistently dominant as a LB in every game I've watched. That was the first game he stood out as a WR. Stokes and #6 have been more consistent. Heck, Studer is a great WR, he's done more too. Brett would make my list, but on D. Didn't realize only your opinion counted.

 

I want to make sure this is right, you'd put Slusher at LB, over Deaton, Woolf, Owens, and Pitzer, right? OK, then who would Slusher start over of these 4 other players at LB?