October 2, 201411 yr Republicans' New Black Friend Is Either A Stock Photo Or Is Having A Very Interesting Day | The Daily Banter
October 2, 201411 yr Author Moral of the Story: Don't insult the intelligence of people who know how to do a reverse image search on Google in the age of social media. I'm sure there was someone who was a successful, attractive, photogenic, black, Republican you could have found for your campaign, but you didn't, so this is a fail.
October 2, 201411 yr Lol at all if the ads that used this one woman, lol! Are you speaking English? If not, please translate this. I have no clue what you are trying to say....
October 2, 201411 yr Are you speaking English? If not' date=' please translate this. I have no clue what you are trying to say....[/quote'] WHAT? It's plain as day what I said! Actually only one letter was messed up, as the major issue with BGP/ForumRunner continue with no answer, I can no longer use it from my iPad, so typos will be plenty with the iPhone. I said "LOL, at all of the ad 's that used this one woman, LOL"
October 2, 201411 yr My guess is this has happened to other political parties as well not just Republican. But let's continue the mud slinging. (Not singling you out Jokerswild24) You know if we spent more time, effort and money trying to solve the problems of this country than doing the "tit for tat" crap that continues, we'd all be better off.
October 2, 201411 yr People, companies, and other groups use stock photos everyday in ads. You buy the right to use a photo without the expense of a photographer or getting a release from the model. Big deal? No, it is not a big deal at all. It is an economic decision and just another example of Democratic politicians and their supporters distracting voters from real issues.
October 2, 201411 yr Stock photo. Why not use a 'real' Republican black person? Have you seen how the Democratic machine treats real people who are both black and Republican?
October 2, 201411 yr Stock photo. Why not use a 'real' Republican black person? Because we can't get PP to come out of the closet as a Republican in public yet!
October 2, 201411 yr Because we can't get PP to come out of the closet as a Republican in public yet! Once I am making 250K+ a year I'll make the switch. :lol2:
October 2, 201411 yr Because we can't get PP to come out of the closet as a Republican in public yet! Ha ha. Maybe have to settle for 'Libertarian' or just blue dog Democrat.
October 2, 201411 yr Once I am making 250K+ a year I'll make the switch. :lol2: Trust me, the level needed is a LOT less than that! :lol2:
October 2, 201411 yr People, companies, and other groups use stock photos everyday in ads. You buy the right to use a photo without the expense of a photographer or getting a release from the model. Big deal? No, it is not a big deal at all. It is an economic decision and just another example of Democratic politicians and their supporters distracting voters from real issues. Just shows you how lazy the people running the campaign were in not finding a real black republican .
October 2, 201411 yr Just shows you how lazy the people running the campaign were in not finding a real black republican . I'd guess the media company hired to make the ads did this without vetting by the campaign. Campaign should have given them photos to use, however. Where did you Avatar go? That was one of my favorites!
October 2, 201411 yr Just shows you how lazy the people running the campaign were in not finding a real black republican .No, it just shows how stupid Democratic politicians think voters are. In most cases, they are right. That's what decades of dumbed-down education has done.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.