March 9, 201511 yr Didn't someone on here say 50-1 paid $2500, if that's true that's good enough value for me. I'd rather take that chance than losing $50 in 30 minutes at blackjack. Explain why it's not a good value Got my bet in on a little 2 day trip to Vegas before the season started, mainly after reading some of this thread and PP92, just waiting for the payout now.
March 9, 201511 yr I'm nervous enough the way it is. I couldn't imagine how'd I'd feel if I had the potential for a big payout.
March 9, 201511 yr That's what UNLV thought in 1991... They didn't have the defense nor the depth. If UK has 4 guys off on offense at the same time they still have 4-5 who can pick up the slack while their defense does it's thing. However, I do agree that it is not a done deal.
March 9, 201511 yr I'm a fan, so I hope they go 40-0. There was a lot discussion about this being a good or bad bet in this thread. Statistically speaking it was a true suckers bet...outcome still in the balance. I would like to see all those that posted vehemently about the bet to come back and have a little crow...
April 5, 201511 yr That's what UNLV thought in 1991... UNLV didn't play defense that remotely resembles the defense this UK team does. UNLV played a completely different style of game. Lack of a strong defense eventually caught up with them. Tried to tell you. UK even lost in the same spot to a team that they had beaten in the tourney the year before like UNLV.
April 5, 201511 yr Kentucky winning out is a done deal imo. As you mentioned their defense is the difference. If they have an off night on offense, they can still hang with anyone due to their defense. That said, their offense has came a long way. Imo, if there going to lose it would have happened by now. From this point on, there are no trap games, they will come out focused every game. Done deal :lol2:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.