Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Did the Police Cross the Legal Line?

Featured Replies

Do you attend any sporting events? Do you have a problem with security checking bags or your person?

Answer my question and I will answer yours.

  • Replies 178
  • Views 14.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Let me ask this, would anyone have a problem with cops pulling over drivers for no reason other then to see if they are drunk or to gain probable cause to search the car?

 

Im not sure why its that hard to see the point Clyde is arguing.

 

Honestly no. Wouldn't bother me a bit.

 

You and a few others have repeatedly made the point that the police cannot check inside of your car after they stop you at a checkpoint. While that is right it's also 100% immaterial to the repeated point I've made. What happens post-stop is not the issue. THE STOP IS THE ISSUE. It goes completely against the 4th amendment.

 

By missing that key point you are missing why my examples/analogies are indeed relevant and material.

 

In your opinion the stop is against the 4th amendment. The courts disagree with your opinion.

 

Yes. But you're talking about going to an event that is ran and owned by a private company. They are not required to have any type of probable cause to ask you to allow them to search you. Your consent is implied as a condition of admission. They can't, however, compel you to consent to a search. You can simply refuse and leave if you want.

 

If you ever get a DUI, you will be read the Implied Consent warning.

 

Irrelevant.

 

There is no 4th Amendment rights regarding a baseball game.

 

The owner of the club or the sport itself is setting the rules.

 

Ok. Lets say your child has been kidnapped. It just happened, and there is only one road leading to the highway. Would you have a problem with the police setting up a road block checking every car before they enter the highway?

  • Author
In your opinion the stop is against the 4th amendment. The courts disagree with your opinion.

 

 

You are the damn king of stating the obvious.

  • Author
Ok. Lets say your child has been kidnapped. It just happened, and there is only one road leading to the highway. Would you have a problem with the police setting up a road block checking every car before they enter the highway?

 

No because I'm selfish when it comes to my child.

 

You are the damn king of stating the obvious.

 

:lol2: and you are the queen of whining.

  • Author
Ok. Lets say your child has been kidnapped. It just happened, and there is only one road leading to the highway. Would you have a problem with the police setting up a road block checking every car before they enter the highway?

 

BTW that is a great question. It's not analogous to my examples but it is indeed a good question.

 

There is ONE key difference between a checkpoint and your example. A known crime has been committed. That's not true in the checkpoint example.

  • Author
:lol2: and you are the queen of whining.

 

I get this when the person I'm debating can't use rational thought.

 

I get this when the person I'm debating can't use rational thought.

 

Who's not using rational thoughts? You make an insult, and get it right back then can only insult in response? Dude get over yourself. You don't like roadblocks, and the courts disagree with you. Just cause you can't convince the majority to go along with you doesn't mean they aren't rational and it certainly doesn't make you the smartest man in the thread. People aren't irrational or stupid because they disagree with you. At the end of the day, it's the court decision on how to interpret the constitution. Not the police officer and certainly not an "expert" such as yourself.

Not to re hash old arguments here: But what is a mobile home considered?

Let me ask this, would anyone have a problem with cops pulling over drivers for no reason other then to see if they are drunk or to gain probable cause to search the car?

 

Im not sure why its that hard to see the point Clyde is arguing.

Coast Guard does this all day every day, they call it a Safety Inspection.
Coast Guard does this all day every day, they call it a Safety Inspection.

 

Is the Coast Guard under a different standard since they are considered a military organization?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.