I don't follow. The point of what?

The act.

The act.

 

Unless you believe "the act" is only for procreation then , again, gays and straights are in the same boat - the other side seems strange and gross.

Doesn't count. Those girls are experimenting and trying to be fashionable and trendy. Watch way too much TV. They're not gay. They love attention.

 

And you know this to be 100% factual in each female case?

And you know this to be 100% factual in each female case?

 

I never say 100% to anything.

 

I stand by my contention.

So....I have a hard time with the mental pic of a woman discussing her sexuality with a 7 year old boy....which is the image I have of you...it's really disturbing...in a Quentin Tarantino movie kind of way.

 

Sent from my DROID X2 using Forum Runner

 

It is disturbing. :lol:

I never say 100% to anything.

 

I stand by my contention.

 

If I told you this statement was made to me about 11 years ago & that the woman who left her husband was still with the woman she left him for, would you still stand by your contention?

I never say 100% to anything.

 

I stand by my contention.

 

Then if you never say 100%, then you can't say it "doesn't count."

If I told you this statement was made to me about 11 years ago & that the woman who left her husband was still with the woman she left him for, would you still stand by your contention?

 

I'd say she's in the minority. I'd say she was probably also always gay.

Then if you never say 100%, then you can't say it "doesn't count."

 

It doesn't count as proof that I was wrong. Too many girls trying to be hip and trendy.

It doesn't count as proof that I was wrong. Too many girls trying to be hip and trendy.

 

On your first sentence, :lol2::lol2::lol2:

 

On your second sentence, I agree that this is often the case.

I know a LOT of gay people. Not one of them made any more conscious of a choice than I did as a straight person. And considering what they have gone through, no one would make that choice capriciously.

Up until two years ago Portman thought the same thing, thagt it was a choice, just think of what his son was thinking and feeling growing up, knowing that his own father co-sponsored DOMA, being anti gay, and also thinking that it's a "choice", why would anyone want to put themselves in his position?

Up until two years ago Portman thought the same thing, thagt it was a choice, just think of what his son was thinking and feeling growing up, knowing that his own father co-sponsored DOMA, being anti gay, and also thinking that it's a "choice", why would anyone want to put themselves in his position?

 

Already tired of the Portman discussion. He loves his son. He would love him if he were an axe murderer too. Doesn't make being an axe murderer or a homosexual right. Or is Portman now right about everything?

Pedaphiles say the same thing. They claim to be born with their attractions. Why would any one choose to be attracted to little children? Where does it end?

 

What does a pedophile have to do with a person that is born gay?

A pedophile is a sick adult that preys on children.

 

I don't believe that the majority of adult gay people are attracted sexually to children,just as I don't believe that the majority of adult straight people are attracted sexually to children...

Already tired of the Portman discussion. He loves his son. He would love him if he were an axe murderer too. Doesn't make being an axe murderer or a homosexual right. Or is Portman now right about everything?

 

Earlier today in a discussion with a friend about this thread, I commented to him "You just wait, some genius is bound to try to use the word homosexual and serial killer in the same breath to try to drive his point"... and... sure enough, in predictable fashion, some genius did just that... Wow... you really thought that one through, didn't you? ... and even thought that it sounded intelligent right before hit "reply"... Just a hunch... any intelligent discussion with you would be futile... correct???

 

Also... earlier today in one of my post, I stated, "People think that their "anti-gay" stance is "an opinion" when it's strictly their inability to comprehend something that affects millions upon millions of people worldwide".

 

Thank you... because with your contribution of thought, you've helped demonstrate that "inability to comprehend" part quite prominently.

 

Already tired of the Portman discussion. He loves his son. He would love him if he were an axe murderer too. Doesn't make being an axe murderer or a homosexual right. Or is Portman now right about everything?

 

The point I was trying to make is at one pint Portman though it was a choice. He no longer thinks that way.