August 29, 201214 yr Does that make sense? Absolutly! I feel your pain, I'm trapped in this old white body when all I really want to do is dunk a basketball. You and me both brother. You and me both.
August 29, 201214 yr Author Yes, it is the same racial code that has been used for as long as I can remember. The key is to fan racial resentment while maintaning plausible deniabilty. I see the Obama campaign doing everything to play the card. I also see people getting really tired of it. Time to put it back in the deck.
August 29, 201214 yr Usually it's only at the Christmas Dance when Tom Jones comes on. :clap::clap:Boy I loved those scenes!
August 30, 201214 yr I see the Obama campaign doing everything to play the card. I also see people getting really tired of it. Time to put it back in the deck. It isn't "playing the card", it is pointing out what is happening. Let me be clear. I do not believe that Republican candidates fan the flames of racial resentment because they are more racist than Democrats. They fan the flames because they think it will work. I don't think that Republican governors and legislatures are trying to suppress the minority vote because they hate minorities. They do it because minorities give a very large percentage of their votes to Democrats. The Republican candidates aren't racists, they are cynics that are quite willing to exploit racial resentments for votes. Look at Paul Ryan's speach last night. What does it say about the Republican ticket when their best arguments for why the incumbant should be tossed out are all based on lies. Medicare, welfare to work, stimulus, the GM plant, all demonstrable lies. How cynical is it to knock the President for not implementing Simpson Bowles when you not only voted against it, you lead the fight to make sure that Simpson Bowles COULDN'T be implemented. Think back to what happened with Simpson Bowles. They came up with a bipartisan plan that would have made real progress. It was never submitted to Congress because the House Republicans on the commission, lead by Paul Ryan, blocked it. The thing that scares me about this election is that lies, repeated often enough are sometimes accepted as truth.
August 30, 201214 yr I really hope I live long enough to not have to see everything political chopped down to being related to race. Unfortunately, that won't happen until my parent's and grandparent's generations have all died off.
August 30, 201214 yr It isn't "playing the card", it is pointing out what is happening. Let me be clear. I do not believe that Republican candidates fan the flames of racial resentment because they are more racist than Democrats. They fan the flames because they think it will work. I don't think that Republican governors and legislatures are trying to suppress the minority vote because they hate minorities. They do it because minorities give a very large percentage of their votes to Democrats. The Republican candidates aren't racists, they are cynics that are quite willing to exploit racial resentments for votes. Look at Paul Ryan's speach last night. What does it say about the Republican ticket when their best arguments for why the incumbant should be tossed out are all based on lies. Medicare, welfare to work, stimulus, the GM plant, all demonstrable lies. How cynical is it to knock the President for not implementing Simpson Bowles when you not only voted against it, you lead the fight to make sure that Simpson Bowles COULDN'T be implemented. Think back to what happened with Simpson Bowles. They came up with a bipartisan plan that would have made real progress. It was never submitted to Congress because the House Republicans on the commission, lead by Paul Ryan, blocked it. The thing that scares me about this election is that lies, repeated often enough are sometimes accepted as truth. That last sentence is right out of Joey's day planner .
August 30, 201214 yr Presidential election years really bring out how much we are polarized and blinded by our political views. We see faults in our opponents but either refuse to see the same thing in those who we support or find a way to justify it.
August 30, 201214 yr It isn't "playing the card", it is pointing out what is happening. Let me be clear. I do not believe that Republican candidates fan the flames of racial resentment because they are more racist than Democrats. They fan the flames because they think it will work. I don't think that Republican governors and legislatures are trying to suppress the minority vote because they hate minorities. They do it because minorities give a very large percentage of their votes to Democrats. The Republican candidates aren't racists, they are cynics that are quite willing to exploit racial resentments for votes. Look at Paul Ryan's speach last night. What does it say about the Republican ticket when their best arguments for why the incumbant should be tossed out are all based on lies. Medicare, welfare to work, stimulus, the GM plant, all demonstrable lies. How cynical is it to knock the President for not implementing Simpson Bowles when you not only voted against it, you lead the fight to make sure that Simpson Bowles COULDN'T be implemented. Think back to what happened with Simpson Bowles. They came up with a bipartisan plan that would have made real progress. It was never submitted to Congress because the House Republicans on the commission, lead by Paul Ryan, blocked it. The thing that scares me about this election is that lies, repeated often enough are sometimes accepted as truth. The 3 House Republicans voted against but 4 Democrats voted against. How does that equal the house republicans blocking?
August 30, 201214 yr The 3 House Republicans voted against but 4 Democrats voted against. How does that equal the house republicans blocking? 3 of 7 Republicans voted against it and 4 of 9 Democrats. Interesting, isn't it. As TA said, "The thing that scares me about this election is that lies, repeated often enough are sometimes accepted as truth." I agree.
August 30, 201214 yr Do you have the percentages backwards or am I missing something? I'm not a math guy so I may have said it wrong. I'm trying to to say that there are so many more white people in the USA than black people that from the naked eye it is hard to see that there are more whites than blacks on welfare. White people make up 78% of the population and blacks make up 13%. 39% of the those whites are on welfare. 37% of the blacks are on welfare. When looking at the total numbers of whites and blacks because there is a significantly less amount of blacks in America it will appear that more blacks are on welfare than white because a larger amount of the total black population is affected. Does that make sense?
August 30, 201214 yr I'm not a math guy so I may have said it wrong. I'm trying to to say that there are so many more white people in the USA than black people that from the naked eye it is hard to see that there are more whites than blacks on welfare. White people make up 78% of the population and blacks make up 13%. 39% of the those whites are on welfare. 37% of the blacks are on welfare. When looking at the total numbers of whites and blacks because there is a significantly less amount of blacks in America it will appear that more blacks are on welfare than white because a larger amount of the total black population is affected. Does that make sense? No, still doesn't. If 39% of whites are on welfare versus 37% of blacks then more whites, total number and percentage, are on welfare. Assuming there are 300,000,000 people in the US 39% of 234,000,000 people = 91,260,000 37% of 39,000,000 people = 14,430,000 If the precentages were reversed and it was 39% of blacks versus 37% of whites then someone could say more blacks are on welfare then whites. That person would dumb and wrong but they could at least have the arguement that the percentage was higher.
August 30, 201214 yr Author It isn't "playing the card", it is pointing out what is happening. Let me be clear. I do not believe that Republican candidates fan the flames of racial resentment because they are more racist than Democrats. They fan the flames because they think it will work. I don't think that Republican governors and legislatures are trying to suppress the minority vote because they hate minorities. They do it because minorities give a very large percentage of their votes to Democrats. The Republican candidates aren't racists, they are cynics that are quite willing to exploit racial resentments for votes. Look at Paul Ryan's speach last night. What does it say about the Republican ticket when their best arguments for why the incumbant should be tossed out are all based on lies. Medicare, welfare to work, stimulus, the GM plant, all demonstrable lies. How cynical is it to knock the President for not implementing Simpson Bowles when you not only voted against it, you lead the fight to make sure that Simpson Bowles COULDN'T be implemented. Think back to what happened with Simpson Bowles. They came up with a bipartisan plan that would have made real progress. It was never submitted to Congress because the House Republicans on the commission, lead by Paul Ryan, blocked it. The thing that scares me about this election is that lies, repeated often enough are sometimes accepted as truth.You do well pointing out the faults of the Republicans yet turn your head at the deplorable campaign Obama and the Democrats are running. Lies, myths, half truths, fear mongering. If you honestly believe what you say in your post, I can't see how you can vote for Romney or Obama, yet you already said you're voting for Obama. If you truly despise this sort of thing, I would think you'd vote third party.
August 30, 201214 yr No, still doesn't. If 39% of whites are on welfare versus 37% of blacks then more whites, total number and percentage, are on welfare. Assuming there are 300,000,000 people in the US 39% of 234,000,000 people = 91,260,000 37% of 39,000,000 people = 14,430,000 If the precentages were reversed and it was 39% of blacks versus 37% of whites then someone could say more blacks are on welfare then whites. That person would dumb and wrong but they could at least have the arguement that the percentage was higher. Yeah, I'm not explaining what I am trying to say well. I am trying to say why it looks like there are more blacks on welfare than whites. Because there are so many white people in America compared to the number of blacks it is hard to see that there are more whites than blacks on welfare. With whites being 78% of the population there very well be more whites on welfare than the total number of blacks in America. Because 1 out of every 4 blacks you see are probably on welfare it's hard to tell. 1 out of every 4 whites isn't on welfare though. What is 37% of 234,000,000? 37% of 39,000,000 affects a larger proportion of the population than 37% of 234,000,000. That's why it looks like more blacks are on welfare than whites.
August 30, 201214 yr You do well pointing out the faults of the Republicans yet turn your head at the deplorable campaign Obama and the Democrats are running. Lies, myths, half truths, fear mongering. If you honestly believe what you say in your post, I can't see how you can vote for Romney or Obama, yet you already said you're voting for Obama. If you truly despise this sort of thing, I would think you'd vote third party. First, I am not a fan of either campaign, but I am a strong supporter of what President Obama has done in office. That doesn't mean everything, but he has tried very hard to take us in the direction we need to go. If he is reelected one of two things will happen. Either the Republicans will drop the obstruction because they know that the country needs action, even if the action is not their first choice. If they stop the obstruction, the country will be better off. If Romney wins, either the Democrats will do the same thing to him and obstruct everything or they will cooperate as the country moves in what I strongly believe is the wrong direction. So no, I won't be voting third party. I will vote in what I believe is the best interest of the country. There is one thing that the Republicans have said that I agree with. The country is at a crossroad. I believe that the Ryan wing of the Republican party wants to return to the gilded age and undo over 100 years of social progress. They won't be able to do everything they want, but my guess is that they might just be able to undo the ACA and voucherize Medicare. They would undo environmental regulations, but that would only be temporary. The underlying laws would remain. They would gut spending on essential infrastructure, but that could be undone. They would make our long term fiscal outlook worse because they will get the tax cuts they want (no one ever lost an election by voting for a tax cut), but they won't get all of the spending cuts they want because the country won't hold still for it.
August 30, 201214 yr Yeah, I'm not explaining what I am trying to say well. I am trying to say why it looks like there are more blacks on welfare than whites. Because there are so many white people in America compared to the number of blacks it is hard to see that there are more whites than blacks on welfare. With whites being 78% of the population there very well be more whites on welfare than the total number of blacks in America. Because 1 out of every 4 blacks you see are probably on welfare it's hard to tell. 1 out of every 4 whites isn't on welfare though. What is 37% of 234,000,000? 37% of 39,000,000 affects a larger proportion of the population than 37% of 234,000,000. That's why it looks like more blacks are on welfare than whites.37% is 37%. It's the same proportion. I think I know what you are trying to say but it would only make sense if the % of blacks on welfare were higher than the % of whites. It other words you could have 50% of the black population on welfare versus 25% of whites and there would still be more whites on welfare then blacks. But if you only looked at the % it would appear there are more blacks.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.