Boucher

I'll give you the home field, but Bo a distraction? I thought it was supposed to be something UM was going to use to get them fired up. I'd love a re-match, but for different reasons than thinking it would be a great game.

This one has to go in the BGP Hall of Fame for most thoughtless post of the year. Beat your fierce rival, who is ranked #2 in the country, win Big 10 Championship, gain a trip to National Championship game, and students and fans shouldn't run on to field? Are you kidding me?

OSU turned it over 3 times, twice on bad snaps, once an int on a tipped ball. I don't recall UM turning it over at all, but I'm not sure. I think UM had all the stars lined up for them, and they still couldn't get it done.

I don't think a rematch would be close at all.

Best 2 teams in the country. Maybe a re-match?

A little early to be blaming the zebras, isn't it?

No, my argument was against this statement: 5 in the Top 25 tells me that the SEC has impressed quite a few people who have something in common with you - Sportswriters.

I thought UL-Monroe was D-1A?

You're the one who said: They must be impressing someone.

Top 25 (AP) Big 10 -3 Pac 10 - 2 Big 12 - 2 SEC - 5 :sleep:

Bengals win this one: Bengals 37 Saints 31

Could OJ be the next Eric Manuel?

Congrats to Elizabeth Goodin from Mercy. A great kid from a great family. :dancingpa

:thumb: Well Said

This is the mindset that keeps UK football down. Keep starting over...

I was never on the Debate team. My personal stance is to always try and call a "spade a spade". As for those who think Brohm is an "overrated loser", those are people who it's not worth the time to even have a discussion with.

You obviously have not read a single post I've made in this thread. My argument is simply that Woodson's had the better statistical year than Brohm. I think Brohm is the better College QB, and obviously had more wins. I can't recall many UL fan's admitting that Woodson has had the better statistical year, most want to argue about the validity of the stats.

How about summing it up like this: Brohm was the higher ranked QB coming out of high school, and is definately more polished than Woodson. Woodson has shown more improvement so far than Brohm, and has had the better statistical season than Brohm. Both are quality QB's for their respective teams, and have bright futures. What I don't understand is the some of the same people who ALWAYS use statistics to back up their argument, now are dismissing statistics, and refuse to give Woodson the nod STATISTICALLY this season. The hipocrisy really makes it hard for me to even read some of their posts. While I am a UK fan, I believe that Brohm is the better College QB, and would start over Woodson if at UK, or if Woodson was at UL. If I was a UL fan, I would be honest enough to admit that Woodson has had the better season. I don't understand what is so difficult about that. Ultimately, good QB's are judged by winning, and obviously Brohm's got the upper hand on Woodson in that category.

PRP won by 10-12 points, but I was told that Ty Proffitt played very little due to an ankle injury.

I want to watch the Johnson Central / Rockcastle game, but I don't know if I'm up for the long, crooked drive.

I guess if Brohm was a St. X grad, played for UK, and Woodson a Trinity grad, playing for UL, and the stats being what they are now, you would have the same point of view? I seriously doubt it.

Ouch.

Why don't you back this up with something other than "I am pretty sure".

Funny how some UL fans appear to be threatened merely at the mention that Brohm is not having the best year statistically of D1 QB's in his state. :laugh:

Vandy was Ranked in the Top 20 in pass defense when UK played them. UL has only played one team in the Top 20 (pass defense) and that was Rutgers. UK's played 4.