May 5, 201115 yr I'm trying to think of who or what might be offended by this. The planet Neptune? or the Neptunians? Why Neptune? Why not Saturn or Uranus?
May 5, 201115 yr Why Neptune? Why not Saturn or Uranus? Well, I suppose you have a point. One could just as easily be outraged that they didn't choose you for the name as you could be for them choosing your name. Why not Running Bear or White Dove? Of course, then you've made some singers mad. These are difficult and delicate decisions. What to name our secret operations?
May 5, 201115 yr I can think of two or three posters on here that I could call extreme or extremely biased, and some that may or may no longer be on here ... I suspect they know who they are.But you've often painted me in that light. So, what's the extreme biased examples of me?
May 5, 201115 yr But you've often painted me in that light. So, what's the extreme biased examples of me?Been there, done that ...
May 5, 201115 yr So...nothing in other words... :lol:Like those "Huffington Post" links you keep accusing me of using. I've still seen no evidence of it. We've had this discussion before ... I don't wish to rehash it for the umpteenth time.
May 5, 201115 yr Like those "Huffington Post" links you keep accusing me of using. I've still seen no evidence of it. We've had this discussion before ... I don't wish to rehash it for the umpteenth time. I'm not talking about links, I'm talking about you saying I'm extremely biased. I'd like to know why you say that, so I'm calling you on it.
May 5, 201115 yr I'm trying to think of who or what might be offended by this. The planet Neptune? or the Neptunians? My first reaction, EXACTLY!!
May 6, 201115 yr I'm not talking about links, I'm talking about you saying I'm extremely biased. I'd like to know why you say that, so I'm calling you on it.Been there, done that ... not going through it again. If you want to know, do a search.
May 6, 201115 yr Been there, done that ... not going through it again. If you want to know, do a search.As I thought, empty criticism, so I really don't need to know. You do this a lot with many on here. As quite a few have pointed out, you're quick to call someone biased but blind to your own.
May 6, 201115 yr As I thought, empty criticism, so I really don't need to know. You do this a lot with many on here. As quite a few have pointed out, you're quick to call someone biased but blind to your own.Calling out others' bias with facts, as I've done with you in the past, doesn't equate to bias. Interesting that since I called you out on your litany of right-leaning, anti-Obama threads, often using links from politically-biased sites, you've cut back on the practice. It's not empty criticism. We've been through it before and I'm simply choosing not to rehash it. Done with it.
May 6, 201115 yr Well they've been looking for UBL for much longer than what you posted. With that being the case, your % of time under Bush's watch is also inaccurate.Bush left office on Jan. 20, 2009, which was seven years and four months (88 months) after 9/11. Obama has been in office for a little more than 27 months. Let's call it 28. 88 + 28 = 116. 88/116 = 76 percent. Wow, I was off by one percent. Sue me.
May 6, 201115 yr Bush left office on Jan. 20, 2009, which was seven years and four months (88 months) after 9/11. Obama has been in office for a little more than 27 months. Let's call it 28. 88 + 28 = 116. 88/116 = 76 percent. Wow, I was off by one percent. Sue me. Your bias doesn't allow you to see how wrong you are, does it? It's sad really. For the last time, we've been looking for Usama since before 9/11. Why is that concept so hard for you to grasp?
May 6, 201115 yr Calling out others' bias with facts, as I've done with you in the past, doesn't equate to bias. Interesting that since I called you out on your litany of right-leaning, anti-Obama threads, often using links from politically-biased sites, you've cut back on the practice. It's not empty criticism. We've been through it before and I'm simply choosing not to rehash it. Done with it. :lol: You give yourself way too much credit. First off, I took a hiatus from P&R for Lent, been on a vacation, have work to be done on my house among other things in my life. You have zero to do with anything I post or don't post. That's a bit of a narcissistic attitude, westsider. :lol: What's fact to you isn't to most because your own bias won't allow you to see the difference. Two good eyes but you still don't see...
May 6, 201115 yr Your bias doesn't allow you to see how wrong you are, does it? It's sad really. For the last time, we've been looking for Usama since before 9/11. Why is that concept so hard for you to grasp? Because some of that time was on a Dem's watch, so it doesn't count in his biased book. :lol:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.