May 5, 201016 yr David Ortiz is at 37.0% of striking out, Stubbs is right around 32.0%.:ohbrother: So he's going to be in the discussion. Thanks for proving my point. :thumb:
May 5, 201016 yr So he's going to be in the discussion. Thanks for proving my point. :thumb: He's practically a rookie... What's Ortiz's excuse? No more PED's?
May 5, 201016 yr David Ortiz is at 37.0% of striking out, Stubbs is right around 32.0%.:ohbrother: For comparison, Dunn is at 25%.
May 5, 201016 yr Let's hope our awful bullpen holds onto the lead... The Mets have been playing good baseball, two out of three will be nice.
May 5, 201016 yr Let's hope our awful bullpen holds onto the lead... The Mets have been playing good baseball, two out of three will be nice. My bad, the Red's bullpen, didn't mean to commit that fatal lapse in judgement.
May 5, 201016 yr He's practically a rookie... What's Ortiz's excuse? No more PED's? Ortiz is over-the-hill....You're right Stubbs is practically a rookie, a rookie who obviously isn't ready for big league pitching.
May 5, 201016 yr Age ... Ortiz's numbers have dramatically declined since it was revealed that he was on PED's... You think that has less of a correlation than his age?
May 5, 201016 yr Ortiz is over-the-hill....You're right Stubbs is practically a rookie, a rookie who obviously isn't ready for big league pitching. He just lacks the plate discipline right now, hopefully being in the big leagues a while longer will help with that...
May 5, 201016 yr Author Mets have tying run at 2nd in the 9th, 1 out Pagan singles to right, runner held at 3rd. 1st and 3rd, 1 out
May 5, 201016 yr Ortiz's numbers have dramatically declined since it was revealed that he was on PED's... You think that has less of a correlation than his age?Yes ... Ortiz's numbers started to decline at age 32, a not-uncommon occurrence in baseball history, especially for guys of his skill set and body type.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.