North Laurel 9 15 17 15 56

 

Shelby Valley 21 19 19 10 69

 

 

North Laurel (9-15) -- Cheek 14, Likins 8, Wardrup 4, Spencer 6, Baker 5, Shearers 13, Jones 2, Creech 4.

 

Shelby Valley (20-3) -- Justice 15, Hatfield 19, Ta.Newsome 7, Ty.Newsome 16, Varney 6, Ramey 6.

Unless SV played their subs most of the second half, this one doesn't look very good for SV after hearing what Trinity did last night at N Laurel.

Unless SV played their subs most of the second half, this one doesn't look very good for SV after hearing what Trinity did last night at N Laurel.

 

SV led by >20 in the 3rd. The lead was over 20 when the bench came in for SV.

 

You get negative comments when you beat teams badly... you get negative comments when you don't beat teams bad enough.

SV led by >20 in the 3rd. The lead was over 20 when the bench came in for SV.

 

You get negative comments when you beat teams badly... you get negative comments when you don't beat teams bad enough.

 

Starters must have played more than you are saying. Ramey was the only sub to score and he only scored 6. Starters had to score the rest. Your comment about the bench coming in when SV was up by +20 in the third doesn't add up.:confused:

SV led by >20 in the 3rd. The lead was over 20 when the bench came in for SV.

 

You get negative comments when you beat teams badly... you get negative comments when you don't beat teams bad enough.

 

You answered my question but I have a hard time believing the starters didn't play much in the 2nd half with only six players scoring for SV.

 

Somebody had to score the 10 for SV in the 4th??

 

Trinity played the starters less than half the game and still won by over 30 at N Laurel.

 

This would all be a mute point if SV had played some games against other top state teams. Since they didn't, those of us who are trying to get a handle on the state's best teams have to evaluate the games they play and see if anything can be determined and what I determined is that SV did not play as well against NL as did Trinity!

 

Want to be ranked in the top ten, then you have to show why you deserve it!

Well I will give great comments if you beat a team badly. Thats what your supposed to do. Yea I can't stand it when people say negative comments of a team that beats a team badly. But yea Trinity is better than this team anyways. This score is surprising to me. Seems like Valley would beat them by 25 or 30 at least.

Edited February 7, 201016 yr by gold sunrise
Rule #13

Is the Valley favored to win their region?

Corbin and Shelby Valley would be a good one!

Starters must have played more than you are saying. Ramey was the only sub to score and he only scored 6. Starters had to score the rest. Your comment about the bench coming in when SV was up by +20 in the third doesn't add up.:confused:

 

I didn't say the bench came in during the 3rd quarter. SV was up >20 in the 3rd and coasted after that. The bench played the last part of the game and NL cut the lead. NL scored the final 8 of the game to make the score more respectable...

Corbin and Shelby Valley would be a good one!

 

I agree.

This score surprises me some considering what Trinity did to the Jags a few days ago.

 

Congrats to SV on the win though.

I agree.

 

:thumb:

Corbin and Shelby Valley would be a good one!

 

When and where do they play?

When and where do they play?

 

They don't, he was just saying!

SV has played 3 teams from GA. 1 from Fla., won the All "A" and the WYMT Classic with not much of a bench other than Ramey.....yet are still looked down on.

 

Booher should beat people by 60pts if possible, because thats the only way you get any respect on here.