This, if memory serves, is the 2nd person to claim that there were no domestic attacks on America during President Bush's tenure. Is there something we're missing? Is it a case of semantics?

 

http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2010/01/rudy-giuliani-no-domestic-attacks-under-bush-one-under-obama.html

Have we been attacked under BHO?

Have we been attacked under BHO?

 

According to Rudy we have. He has the score as Obama 1, Bush 0.

 

How are we now defining "domestic attacks?"

According to Rudy we have. He has the score as Obama 1, Bush 0.

 

How are we now defining "domestic attacks?"

 

He is just flat wrong

I think he means attacks in the home. I guess.

He's wrong on the domestic attacks, right on the trials.

We obviously know that THEY know that 9.11 happened. So with that what can we attribute the "no domestic attacks" mantra we're starting to hear?

It's typical partisan politics. Like when the Dems blame Bush for the economy, nothing new, both sides are guilty.

We obviously know that THEY know that 9.11 happened. So with that what can we attribute the "no domestic attacks" mantra we're starting to hear?

 

Why do we attribute anything to statements from anyone in politics anymore? There are so few who will say exactly what they mean without trying to lay blame elsewhere or to make their side look better. I truly can't think of a one. It's pitiful.

Why do we attribute anything to statements from anyone in politics anymore? There are so few who will say exactly what they mean without trying to lay blame elsewhere or to make their side look better. I truly can't think of a one. It's pitiful.

 

Amen!

I agree with the statement that this is just partisan politics, and saying 'Obama1 Bush0?" How wrong is that to keep score? Plus as we all know 9-11 was under Bush, but he is not to blame, it is the system if anything!

 

I do not care if you are Democrat, Republican or other, no one wants an attack! But like it or not, they will try. They do not care about attacking now, they take their time, they seem to be testing our system now and see where we are vulnerable and how we react.

 

Unfortunately we will have more attacks, its not a matter of if, its a matter of when. We have never had to deal with an ideology like this before.

It's typical partisan politics. Like when the Dems blame Bush for the economy, nothing new, both sides are guilty.

 

I struggle to relate the two. The economy and who is influencing it is a matter of debate. The repeated line that there were no domestic terrorist attacks is hardly debatable. Its so obvious that it makes me ask, again, why are we hearing this line?

I struggle to relate the two. The economy and who is influencing it is a matter of debate. The repeated line that there were no domestic terrorist attacks is hardly debatable. Its so obvious that it makes me ask, again, why are we hearing this line?

Come on, Clyde. This is the same old song and dance that's been done by all politicians since forever. I'm shocked that you're amazed by it.

Come on, Clyde. This is the same old song and dance that's been done by all politicians since forever. I'm shocked that you're amazed by it.

 

Give me an example that measures upto this one and one that isn't can't be debated. This one is like Truman and his supporters saying "We have never had a bomb dropped on US soil during our presidency."

 

Its been said at least twice by people in the R party. That tells me that its a strategy. I just can't figure out what the strategy is.

Didn't Rudy later say he misspoke? He did not try to defend his statement.