October 10, 200917 yr Cats have their chances, but can't come up with the win. Why in the world wasn't Cobb in the game on the 2 point Conversion!? I really didn't understand the fake FG either. I would have took the easy 3.
October 10, 200917 yr A couple of calls, specifically the holding call was crap on a drive that would have gave UK all they needed to win this game. Brooks took several fourth down chances that I didn't mind, the snap infraction call was a killer.
October 10, 200917 yr Spurrer servs Coach Brooks his lunch again. UK was the better team today and our coaching staff finds a way to choke it away. Fake FG and two point conversion was just a joke, Joker!!!!!!:irked::irked::irked::irked:
October 10, 200917 yr Author Spurrer servs Coach Brooks his lunch again. UK was the better team today and our coaching staff finds a way to choke it away. Fake FG and two point conversion was just a joke, Joker!!!!!!:irked::irked::irked::irked: I agree.
October 10, 200917 yr Author Does UK ever beat anyone in the SC East? I mean really Vandy, and UGA (a few years ago).
October 10, 200917 yr Spurrer servs Coach Brooks his lunch again. UK was the better team today and our coaching staff finds a way to choke it away. Fake FG and two point conversion was just a joke, Joker!!!!!!:irked::irked::irked::irked: Fake FG was a joke? UK had been sputtering the entire 3rd quarter and it looked like to me Brooks was looking for a way to win the game instead of just stay in it. Not to mention that the play didn't even cost them as subsenquently got the fumble from Garcia and got the FG anyway. If the coach plays it safe and loses he should have gone for it, if he takes a chance and it doesn't work then he is an idiot. Whatever, I liked it and I'll take a coach who goes for it over one that plays it safe all the time.
October 10, 200917 yr Spurrer servs Coach Brooks his lunch again. UK was the better team today and our coaching staff finds a way to choke it away. Fake FG and two point conversion was just a joke, Joker!!!!!!:irked::irked::irked::irked: From watching I would say the teams looked even...both were equally as bad. Uk's defense isn't very good. South Carolina in general isn't very good either.
October 10, 200917 yr From watching I would say the teams looked even...both were equally as bad. Uk's defense isn't very good. South Carolina in general isn't very good either. UK played this game without their top 3 CB's.
October 10, 200917 yr From watching I would say the teams looked even...both were equally as bad. Uk's defense isn't very good. South Carolina in general isn't very good either. I have no doubt that Lindley would have been the difference in the game. No way that reciever goes off like he does for 3 TD's against him.
October 10, 200917 yr Terrible coaching. :ohbrother: What do you guys want? Other than the 2 point conversion where was the terrible coaching in play? They played the second half with their 2nd string QB, without their top corners and they had a chance to win. Sounds like a crap coaching job to me......
October 10, 200917 yr UK played this game without their top 3 CB's. No doubt Lindley would have been a game changer in this one.
October 10, 200917 yr UK played this game without their top 3 CB's.Statistically UK isn't very good on defense.
October 10, 200917 yr Author UK played this game without their top 3 CB's. Good points. Just think if we had them. Differnt story IMO. :thumb:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.