August 25, 200917 yr ^ Do it. He wants Jackson because he said it is too uneven with Roy Williams. He wanted Michael Turner but I said no, so he changed it to Roy Williams, He kept making the offer sweeter because we were tlaking on facebook. He originally said I could have any 3 players for Turner and Roy Williams, but that changed and this is what we settled on and I wanted some advice.
August 25, 200917 yr I need help. I need a big time WR so I'm thinking this is a no go but I get: Kevin Walter Vincent Jackson I give: Clinton Portis 11 teams, 1 qb, 2 rb, 2wr, 1flex, te, D,K QB's: Rodgers, Romo RB's: M Forte, C Johnson, Clinton Portis, Ronnie Brown, WR's: Brylan Edwards, Desean Jackson, Lee Evans, L Coles, Josh Morgan, Robert Meachem TE: Tony scheffler D: Baltimore K:Nate Keading
August 25, 200917 yr 11 teams, 1 qb, 2 rb, 2wr, 1flex, te, D,K QB's: Rodgers, Romo RB's: M Forte, C Johnson, Clinton Portis, Ronnie Brown, WR's: Brylan Edwards, Desean Jackson, Lee Evans, L Coles, Josh Morgan, Robert Meachem TE: Tony scheffler D: Baltimore K:Nate Keading Great running backs, bad wide receivers. I'd trade Brown or Portis for a better wide receiver.
August 25, 200917 yr ^ I'd personally take the Jennings side as I see him as the best player in the deal.
August 25, 200917 yr Author Matt Ryan and Tedd Ginn Jr for Matt Cassell and Greg Jennings Thoughts? If the team receiving Cassell/Jennings has a dependable back up QB, I'd probably take it, because I see Cassell as a hit-or-miss type player this year.
August 25, 200917 yr Matt Ryan and Tedd Ginn Jr for Matt Cassell and Greg Jennings Thoughts? Not even, IMO. Whoever is getting Jennings is getting the best end of this one. He's the only elite player out of the 4 involved in the deal. I do think Ryan is better than Cassell, but the difference is nowhere near enough to offset Jennings and Ginn.
August 25, 200917 yr If the team receiving Cassell/Jennings has a dependable back up QB, I'd probably take it, because I see Cassell as a hit-or-miss type player this year. Romo and Brees are his other QB's
August 25, 200917 yr Not even, IMO. Whoever is getting Jennings is getting the best end of this one. He's the only elite player out of the 4 involved in the deal. I do think Ryan is better than Cassell, but the difference is nowhere near enough to offset Jennings and Ginn. It's a dynasty league. Cassell will probably never even see the starting lineup as Romo and Brees are in front of him. The team sending Cassell/Jennings has Brady as a starter and is looking for a future replacement. Other WR's that could replace Jennings are White and Calvin Johnson. So in order to facilitate the trade, Jennings probably had to be included.
August 25, 200917 yr Romo and Brees are his other QB's So, he has Romo, Brees and Ryan right now? He'd be crazy not to accept this trade. Jennings may be the best WR of the second tier guys. Over the last two years, if you pro-rate his production to a 16-game average he's giving you 1220 yards and 11-12 TD. Ginn may not have that much production for his career. And, he obviously doesn't need the QB. I'd make the trade anyway...without knowing anything else, I'd rather have Cassell and Jennings.
August 25, 200917 yr It's a dynasty league. Cassell will probably never even see the starting lineup as Romo and Brees are in front of him. The team sending Cassell/Jennings has Brady as a starter and is looking for a future replacement. Other WR's that could replace Jennings are White and Calvin Johnson. So in order to facilitate the trade, Jennings probably had to be included. So, the guy who has Jennings also has White and CJ? Did I understand that correctly? Either way, it makes more sense now, but I still don't think I'd do it.
August 25, 200917 yr So, the guy who has Jennings also has White and CJ? Did I understand that correctly? Either way, it makes more sense now, but I still don't think I'd do it. That's the way I understand it. And if we are correct, in no way is he getting max value for Jennings. I'm sure he can get a much better reciever back than Ginn, maybe he only gets a QB like Flacco back, but for the next several years Brady will still be "the man" on his team.
August 25, 200917 yr So, the guy who has Jennings also has White and CJ? Did I understand that correctly? Either way, it makes more sense now, but I still don't think I'd do it. Actually the WR corps is as follows: Jennings White Johnson Holmes V Jackson L Robinson Start 2-3 WR's.
August 25, 200917 yr That's the way I understand it. And if we are correct, in no way is he getting max value for Jennings. I'm sure he can get a much better reciever back than Ginn, maybe he only gets a QB like Flacco back, but for the next several years Brady will still be "the man" on his team. :thumb: I wouldn't worry about it right now. Brady will be an elite QB for several more years. Jennings should be an elite receiver for several more years as well. I just wouldn't give up that value. He could easily be a top 5 producer at that position.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.