July 22, 200917 yr No one is saying that LBBC has to apologize for anything. But, why do people have to be afraid to pose a question such as "is honesty intrinsically Christian" for instance?Don't you think UKMF's post... [What does that have to do with being a Christian? Are Muslims or Jews or people of other religions not honest?] ...came off as the least bit confrontational? Does it not sound like he is accusing LBBC of declaring his to be the one true religion? And lastly--and I think, most importantly--when the hell did I start taking LBBC's side on stuff anyway? I mean, what's up with that?! :confused:
July 22, 200917 yr And lastly--and I think, most importantly--when the hell did I start taking LBBC's side on stuff anyway? I mean, what's up with that?! :confused: Seriously- any side that has Habib, you, AND LBBC is hands down a winner.
July 22, 200917 yr Seriously- any side that has Habib, you, AND LBBC is hands down a winner. Funny, I would've said just the opposite....
July 22, 200917 yr Funny, I would've said just the opposite.... I will admit that you, RM, and formerky represent an equally diverse squad. Which is why me being on your opponent's pushes them over the top.
July 22, 200917 yr Don't you think UKMF's post... [What does that have to do with being a Christian? Are Muslims or Jews or people of other religions not honest?] ...came off as the least bit confrontational? Does it not sound like he is accusing LBBC of declaring his to be the one true religion? And lastly--and I think, most importantly--when the hell did I start taking LBBC's side on stuff anyway? I mean, what's up with that?! :confused: When was the last time UKMustang and I were on the same side of anything? :lol::idunno:
July 22, 200917 yr Seriously- any side that has Habib, you, AND LBBC is hands down a winner. Can I join this team? Seriously, typing has a huge disadvantage over the spoken word. You can't read body language or tone of voice. I think that UKMF mistook LBBC's intent and that UKMF's original post did sound a bit confrontational, though that may not have been his intent. He does bring up a good point that could be a thread all of it's own. That being said...I'm not sure which side I'm really on. :lol:
July 22, 200917 yr Author I was at the state tournament this year and went to buy a coke, it was 2.50, I gave the guy a 10 and he gave me 17.50 back. I didn't realize until I was back at the hotel, but the next morning session I went to find the guy and give him the extra money and he looked like I had 7 heads. I could have kept the extra $10, but the guy was old and it looked like he couldn't afford to come up short on his drawer; and it was the right thing to do. Is that the kinda stuff you're asking about LBBC? O absolutely. It would have been so easy to pocket that and no one would have ever known. Had to be tempting.
July 22, 200917 yr When was the last time UKMustang and I were on the same side of anything? :lol::idunno: :lol: Has there ever been one?
July 22, 200917 yr Author Don't you think UKMF's post... [What does that have to do with being a Christian? Are Muslims or Jews or people of other religions not honest?] ...came off as the least bit confrontational? Does it not sound like he is accusing LBBC of declaring his to be the one true religion? And lastly--and I think, most importantly--when the hell did I start taking LBBC's side on stuff anyway? I mean, what's up with that?! :confused: I almost posting this might be a first on us agreeing on something.:lol::lol::lol::lol: I do appreciate it.:thumb:
July 22, 200917 yr No, I think UKMF just read too much into a casual comment. You however (based on your recent threads) have a bit of an agenda in the matter.:lol: :lol: You obviously don't know me very well. Those threads were directed mainly towards three posters, whose spiritual values I respect and am impressed with (and anyone else who joined in was just icing on the cake). I also value their opinions and had a few thread ideas I thought they may find interesting and could spark good discussion. I think I know what you are implying and it's silly, but oh well, no sleep lost here. As far as this thread goes...well it's easy to see what I intended, though the Christian brethren seemed to ignore it. I guess I need to use my original disclaimer in ever religion based thread. :confused:
July 22, 200917 yr :lol: :lol: You obviously don't know me very well. Those threads were directed mainly towards three posters, whose spiritual values I respect and am impressed with (and anyone else who joined in was just icing on the cake). I also value their opinions and had a few thread ideas I thought they may find interesting and could spark good discussion. I think I know what you are implying and it's silly, but oh well, no sleep lost here. As far as this thread goes...well it's easy to see what I intended, though the Christian brethren seemed to ignore it. I guess I need to use my original disclaimer in every religion based thread. :confused: You could have made the point without attacking lbbc...then you could have added a #5 on post 40. I guess 4 out of 5 ain't bad... Especially for an infidel.
July 22, 200917 yr It's not. It is a poster trying to be offended where there is no offense. It is a poster trying to read something into a post that is not there. I am done with your line of questioning in this thread because it didn't deserve the post I made here concerning it. I agree. This another instance of "political correctness" gone awry. Mustang needs to do what my grandmother use to tell us to do when we got "our underwear in a wad" over nothing . . . "scratch our mad place and get glad again!":D
July 22, 200917 yr I agree. This another instance of "political correctness" gone awry. Mustang needs to do what my grandmother use to tell us to do when we got "our underwear in a wad" over nothing . . . "scratch our mad place and get glad again!":D I have no idea where you guys are getting this absurd idea that I was offended or something by the original post. :confused: I simply asked a question that I thought was related. I don't know how much clearer I can make it.
July 22, 200917 yr You could have made the point without attacking lbbc...then you could have added a #5 on post 40. I guess 4 out of 5 ain't bad... Especially for an infidel. :lol: I can't tarnish my rebellious image! :taz:
July 23, 200917 yr Well now you have me upset, too. :cry: This is what frustrates me about P&R- we do political threads, RM hates me. We do religious threads, formerky hates me. I'm going to go read some von Mises to cheer me up. I don't hate you.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.