June 29, 200917 yr I can honestly say I'm not real excited about any of the candidates mentioned. Holiday would obviously intrigue me the most as a Reds fan, but would he be worth what he would cost, and be much of an upgrade over the Nix/Gomes platoon? Matt Holliday Gary Matthews Jr Julio Lugo. Josh Willingham Ty Wigginton http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/9743144/Losing-out-on-DeRosa-has-Reds-looking-elsewhere
June 29, 200917 yr I hope the Reds don't spend too much. I think Josh Willingham would be a nice pickup. Interesting the Lugo and Nyjer Morgan are mentioned as well....
June 29, 200917 yr Gomes/Nix are putting up similar numbers to Holliday thus far this season True, but (correct me if I'm wrong) isn't Oakland a pitcher's park? Holliday had some sick numbers back at Coors Field, and I'd like to see what he could do at GABP, as well as the fact that pitchers are going to pitch him quite differently then they would Gomes/Nix.
June 29, 200917 yr Gomes/Nix are putting up similar numbers to Holliday thus far this seasonHuge difference in ballparks ... and Nix's numbers are dropping fast, not unexpected as he got regular exposure.
June 29, 200917 yr Willingham and Wigginton could provide some help at a reasonable price ... I doubt that either player would command more than a middling prospect.
June 29, 200917 yr True, but (correct me if I'm wrong) isn't Oakland a pitcher's park? Holliday had some sick numbers back at Coors Field, and I'd like to see what he could do at GABP, as well as the fact that pitchers are going to pitch him quite differently then they would Gomes/Nix. It is. Holliday would most likely do very well in GABP, but they'd have to give up a lot to get him. I'd like to see E5 return and see if he can provide a spark...then if his return doesn't help out, look at other options.
June 29, 200917 yr They may very well go with who they have this season. I see SS and CF as a bigger issue than LF or 3rd.
June 29, 200917 yr Author Gomes and Nix vs Holliday Gome/Nix: .285, 23 doubles, 31 runs, 11 hr, 36 rbi in 228 ab's (1.2 million) Matt Holliday: ..274, 16 doubles, 36 runs, 8 hr, 39 rbi in 270 ab's (13.5 million)
June 29, 200917 yr They may very well go with who they have this season. I see SS and CF as a bigger issue than LF or 3rd. Walt has his work cut out for him to figure out the SS issue for next season. I'd like them eat Willy's contract and figure something else out for CF but I don't see that happening.
June 29, 200917 yr Out of those targets I believe the Reds would have the best chance of landing Josh Willingham and I think he could possibly end up as being a really good pickup.
June 29, 200917 yr Unless the Reds can obtain Holliday--and he returns to his Coors Field numbers, are any of those players enough to turn around the Reds offense this season? I don't think so, and if not why give away prospects and take on payroll when there really isn't much of a chance of this club making a run in the playoffs? If they knew Holliday could put up Rockies type numbers it might be worth it but otherwise I'd pass on the other targets unless they came incredibly cheap. Although I'd be very happy if the Reds would take Lugo off of the Red Sox hands.
June 29, 200917 yr Unless the Reds can obtain Holliday--and he returns to his Coors Field numbers, are any of those players enough to turn around the Reds offense this season? I don't think so, and if not why give away prospects and take on payroll when there really isn't much of a chance of this club making a run in the playoffs? If they knew Holliday could put up Rockies type numbers it might be worth it but otherwise I'd pass on the other targets unless they came incredibly cheap. Although I'd be very happy if the Reds would take Lugo off of the Red Sox hands. If they get to the playoffs...what makes you think they can't make a run deep into them? I'd put their pitching staff up against any in the league, especially if Volquez returns healthy. Now, IMO its a pretty big if......but I've seen stranger things happen. They are 2.5 games out. They withstood basically a month without their best hitter in the lineup. They've gone basically a month without one of their top pitchers. They've gone two months without E5, who may not be the best player, but would have helped on the offense more than some think. It's almost July and they are 2.5 back...it's probably not likely they make the playoffs, but like I said, stranger things have happened.
June 29, 200917 yr Author Unless the Reds can obtain Holliday--and he returns to his Coors Field numbers, are any of those players enough to turn around the Reds offense this season? I don't think so, and if not why give away prospects and take on payroll when there really isn't much of a chance of this club making a run in the playoffs? If they knew Holliday could put up Rockies type numbers it might be worth it but otherwise I'd pass on the other targets unless they came incredibly cheap. Although I'd be very happy if the Reds would take Lugo off of the Red Sox hands. :thumb::thumb: I agree. No way I trade away any top prospects for Holliday.
June 29, 200917 yr If they get to the playoffs...what makes you think they can't make a run deep into them? I'd put their pitching staff up against any in the league, especially if Volquez returns healthy. Now, IMO its a pretty big if......but I've seen stranger things happen. They are 2.5 games out. They withstood basically a month without their best hitter in the lineup. They've gone basically a month without one of their top pitchers. They've gone two months without E5, who may not be the best player, but would have helped on the offense more than some think. It's almost July and they are 2.5 back...it's probably not likely they make the playoffs, but like I said, stranger things have happened. While they are only 2.5 games out they are still just 37-37. Anything can happen in the playoffs but while the Reds staff is as strong as any in the league there are other things to consider. In the playoffs you mostly face the top of the other team's starters and bullpen. Most of the contenders can match up with them at the top of their staff and still have better offenses. None of the players mentioned in the article are good enough to make me think that they can make the Reds favorites in the Central and if that is the case why give up prospects when they have such a young core and should be better next season?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.