May 13, 200917 yr Next year it won't be comparable or not, we will know. We win championship then its this class but if we get to the finals and loose on a timeout then they are the same. Fab Five is a prove team though and this team isn't. This is the 2nd or 3rd time I've seen the above fallacy posted about the Fab Five. Their freshmen year they were soundly beaten in the second half by Duke. Their Sophomore year they lost to UNC but they were behind when Webber walked (got away with it), drove down the court and into the corner, panicked and signaled time out. They were behind. Not ahead and there was no given from that corner that they would get a shot off if Webber doesn't call a TO. :ohbrother:
May 13, 200917 yr This is the 2nd or 3rd time I've seen the above fallacy posted about the Fab Five. Their freshmen year they were soundly beaten in the second half by Duke. Their Sophomore year they lost to UNC but they were behind when Webber walked (got away with it), drove down the court and into the corner, panicked and signaled time out. They were behind. Not ahead and there was no given from that corner that they would get a shot off if Webber doesn't call a TO. :ohbrother: I really don't care because the fact is that they lost so behind or not they lost. Just comparing them the best anyone can and thats what the Fab Five did because this UK team hasn't proven anything yet.
May 13, 200917 yr I really don't care because the fact is that they lost so behind or not they lost. Just comparing them the best anyone can and thats what the Fab Five did because this UK team hasn't proven anything yet.[/QUOTE] :thumb:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.