March 16, 200917 yr No... Do you agree that if he does not make some big improvements next year he could be in some major hot water? That is what I think.
March 16, 200917 yr Why not? He has had 3 years. Even though it ended in disappointment, the season probably was more successful than many fans had anticipated.
March 16, 200917 yr Why not? He has had 3 years. They were a mess when he got there. This is the only disappointing season that he has had imo.
March 16, 200917 yr 3 years isn't nearly enough time to turn around what he was handed. I think he is on schedule.
March 16, 200917 yr 3 years isn't nearly enough time to turn around what he was handed. I think he is on schedule. I agree, but a solid NIT invitation would have been a nice step.
March 16, 200917 yr Author I wonder if UC contacted the NIT and informed them they would not go to the NIT. Because I just don't see how they would not have got one of them. Was their loss to DePaul that bad.
March 16, 200917 yr I wonder if UC contacted the NIT and informed them they would not go to the NIT. Because I just don't see how they would not have got one of them. Was their loss to DePaul that bad. Yes. They didn't deserve a bid to the NIT.
March 16, 200917 yr Yes. They didn't deserve a bid to the NIT. Sadly, I have to agree. Thr freefall to end the season sealed that.
March 16, 200917 yr Guys on SOAS pretty much hung the season on Mike Williams last night. Was this fair?
March 16, 200917 yr I was hoping they would put them against UK in the first round of the NIT so the Cats could POUND them into the ground!
March 16, 200917 yr Guys on SOAS pretty much hung the season on Mike Williams last night. Was this fair? Yes...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.