January 5, 200917 yr I guess I don't visit it enough to notice that much of a difference. It looks like the background color is different, but what other changes does it have?
January 5, 200917 yr Author Hopefully it will make their information more accurate. I don't thing they have anyone on the team with that kind of web development skillset.:thumb:
January 5, 200917 yr It's similar, but different. Which is fine I suppose, but if you're going through the time and effort of a redesign, shouldn't it be a little more radical?
January 5, 200917 yr Hopefully it will make their information more accurate. :lol: Firing Chris Mortenson would be a step in that direction.
January 5, 200917 yr Im kind of mixed right now, it will take some time getting used to it to be comfortable.
January 5, 200917 yr Author Im kind of mixed right now, it will take some time getting used to it to be comfortable. That's the way I feel. It seems a little slower for me, as well.
January 5, 200917 yr I noticed this yesterday and didn't like it at all. I'm on there everyday so I'm sure I'll get used to it, but to be honest the old version didn't have anything wrong with it at all.
January 5, 200917 yr I don't like it. I always say, if it aint broke, dont fix it. The "old" version was great.
January 5, 200917 yr They are really pushing their video section which is why they have the tabs above the picture graphic. You will see more and more info-themed web sites doing this, much like cnn.com, etc.
January 5, 200917 yr Don't like it. Seems like you have to load more pages to get where you want to go. Before you could mouse over the sport and a drop down would pop so you could go directly to scoreboard, rankings, or whatever. Now you have to load the page for that sport and then select rankings.
January 5, 200917 yr I was actually chosen to be a part of the Beta testing group for this about 2 months ago and have been using it since. I feel it's a lot better and much faster and much more aesthetically pleasing.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.