November 2, 200817 yr Author ^ The lid on Pandora's box cracks open a wee bit more... You are hilariously making my point. :thumb::thumb::thumb:
November 2, 200817 yr I believe that homosexuality does pose health risks. For graphic nature, if you are curious, you can PM me, or search yourself. I would love to know what health risks that homosexuality poses that heterosexuality doesn't. PM me and let me know.
November 2, 200817 yr What if one of the partners is sterile? I don't know. I do not claim to have all of the answers.
November 2, 200817 yr I have a question. Why do some people fight homosexual marriage so much? Honestly, what difference does it make to YOU whether two people are joined in marriage?
November 2, 200817 yr Here is another set of questions. Is there a large demand of people wanting to marry their relatives? Is there a large demand of people wanting to marry animals? Basically what I am asking is, is there a need to even discuss whether or not marrying a relative/animal should be legal? I'm not aware of any Incest marriage movements.
November 2, 200817 yr Here is another set of questions. Is there a large demand of people wanting to marry their relatives? Is there a large demand of people wanting to marry animals? Basically what I am asking is, is there a need to even discuss whether or not marrying a relative/animal should be legal? I'm not aware of any Incest marriage movements. Not yet... emphasis on the yet.
November 2, 200817 yr Not yet... emphasis on the yet. Are you saying there will be? What evidence can you use to justify that assumption?
November 2, 200817 yr I don't think it is anyones business who someone marries. I don't see the harm and don't understand why to control someone who don't agree with. The divorce rate does bother me, but I know you can't control that. Religiously, I totally disagree with you. In the case of a civil union, I'm with you.
November 2, 200817 yr I have a question. Why do some people fight homosexual marriage so much? Honestly, what difference does it make to YOU whether two people are joined in marriage?It's only from the religious view that I fight it, as I've said, I have zero problem with a civil union.
November 2, 200817 yr It's only from the religious view that I fight it, as I've said, I have zero problem with a civil union. More or less call it "civil union" not marriage and your cool with it.
November 2, 200817 yr I don't know. I do not claim to have all of the answers. Just being the advocatus diaboli.
November 2, 200817 yr More or less call it "civil union" not marriage and your cool with it.No, they can call it marriage if they want, just so long as it's not done in a church.
November 2, 200817 yr No, they can call it marriage if they want, just so long as it's not done in a church. What? You don't mind the government allowing it to be called civil unions, but you want the government to prevent churches from defining marriage?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.