September 18, 200817 yr I'm not sure Vlad's ready to be flushed down the toilet just because of one year off his norm. He's still only 33. Don't get me wrong I would like to have him but I think they need a 120+ RBI guy.
September 18, 200817 yr Author This and this. One is a career .900 OPS guy, the other's a career .800 guy. They're the same age, and Bay's hit 60 more HRs and drove in 170 more runs, and scored nearly 200 more runs. I can't believe I'm having this conversation ... You forgot one. Has played in over 100 more games.
September 18, 200817 yr You forgot one. Has played in over 100 more games. So that tells me one of two things: Bay stays healthy and Nady doesn't, or Nady has never shown himself to be an everyday guy. Until this year, if I ever needed a short-term fantasy OF help, Nady's always been available on the waiver wire. Bay is never on the wire.' Are you related to Nady or something? You think waaaayyyyyy too highly of a guy who's pretty much a journeyman.
September 18, 200817 yr Don't get me wrong I would like to have him but I think they need a 120+ RBI guy. I think he can still do that. I have a feeling he would be flattered by a switch in leagues.
September 18, 200817 yr Author So that tells me one of two things: Bay stays healthy and Nady doesn't, or Nady has never shown himself to be an everyday guy. Until this year, if I ever needed a short-term fantasy OF help, Nady's always been available on the waiver wire. Bay is never on the wire.' Are you related to Nady or something? You think waaaayyyyyy too highly of a guy who's pretty much a journeyman. The last three years he has been a very productive player. He did undergo Tommy John surgery a few years back, but has bounced back nicely. His numbers the last couple of years aren't that far off from Bay's. 2007 Bay BA .247 HR 21 RBI 84 SO 141 2007 Nady BA.278 HR 20 RBI 72 SO 101 2008 Bay BA .282 HR 30 RBI 98 SO 129 2008 Nady BA.300 HR 24 RBI 90 SO 100 Like I said before, it's not always about going after guys like Holliday, and Vlad. Heck why not throw in Manny? This isn't a fantasy Team, the Reds have to be "realistic" and go after guys they can afford without breaking the bank. If the Reds could land someone like Nady for 3 mill, or Bay for 6 mill, I go with Nady all day. Oh, and that's 3mill they still have for other needs.
September 18, 200817 yr Author I think he can still do that. I have a feeling he would be flattered by a switch in leagues. Let me get this right. You want Vlad to go from a possible WS Champ in LA, to the Cincinnati Reds? Oh, and you want the Reds to pay him 16 mill to boot? :lol::lol: Can I get some of what you have?
September 18, 200817 yr Somebody needs to get into Patterson's safe deposit box and burn those pics of Dusty hanging out with those college girls. Or just post them on the internet and go ahead and get it over with! :ylsuper:
September 18, 200817 yr Well, I went downstairs for a while, came back and now we're comparing Matt Holliday to Xavier Nady? Whoa. Nady has had a great year, though. I don't think Vladdy would be a good addition. I'm a huge Vladdy fan, but I don't think he fits with the Reds. Not really sure why, but I can't justify the Reds, as a self-proclaimed "small market" team giving a 33 year old player that type of money. Vladdy spent a lot of time on the turf in Montreal, and we've seen how that can shorten / ruin careers. Matt Holliday would be a good addition. I like that, and the Rockies are looking to deal him. They're also looking to deal Garrett Atkins in the offseason, who is a very good switch-hitting corner infielder. I know that the Dodgers have expressed interest in both; however, I don't see those two going to the same team. Maybe they'll deal Atkins first, and Edwin could fill their void at 3rd. I'd be very willing to trade Edwin & a mid-level prospect to Colorado for Holliday. Not sure that the Rockies would be, though. There is a lot of young talent on this roster, and we're a couple good moves away from being a threat. Of course, in the past, we haven't made the right calls on who to sign / who not to sign. Hopefully Jocketty can turn that around.
September 18, 200817 yr Author Well, I went downstairs for a while, came back and now we're comparing Matt Holliday to Xavier Nady? Whoa. Nady has had a great year, though. I don't think Vladdy would be a good addition. I'm a huge Vladdy fan, but I don't think he fits with the Reds. Not really sure why, but I can't justify the Reds, as a self-proclaimed "small market" team giving a 33 year old player that type of money. Vladdy spent a lot of time on the turf in Montreal, and we've seen how that can shorten / ruin careers. Matt Holliday would be a good addition. I like that, and the Rockies are looking to deal him. They're also looking to deal Garrett Atkins in the offseason, who is a very good switch-hitting corner infielder. I know that the Dodgers have expressed interest in both; however, I don't see those two going to the same team. Maybe they'll deal Atkins first, and Edwin could fill their void at 3rd. I'd be very willing to trade Edwin & a mid-level prospect to Colorado for Holliday. Not sure that the Rockies would be, though. There is a lot of young talent on this roster, and we're a couple good moves away from being a threat. Of course, in the past, we haven't made the right calls on who to sign / who not to sign. Hopefully Jocketty can turn that around. Who is? I must of missed that.
September 18, 200817 yr Author ^ Yea, that one's been thrown around a little. I just felt like Nady might be a logical choice. The Yanks will probably listen to all kinds of offers and the fact that Nady is about 3 million dollars cheaper than Bay, I feel he would be a more realistic choice for the Reds.
September 18, 200817 yr Why hasn't Dickerson been included by anyone in this? I like this guy alot and I think he fills the leadoff spot problem.
September 18, 200817 yr Author Why hasn't Dickerson been included by anyone in this? I like this guy alot and I think he fills the leadoff spot problem. You can include anyone you want. I like Dickerson as well, he's done a very nice job.
September 18, 200817 yr Bay, Nady, not much difference.Wrong. Nady's lifetime OBP ... .336 Nady's lifetime SLP ... .460 Bay's lifetime OBP ... .374 Bay's lifetime SLP ... .517 Nady is having a career year. Bay is having much the same season he's had in three of the last four years. Bay is the better player, period. Nady might not be a bad acquisition, but it shouldn't cost Phillips and Arroyo to get him.
September 18, 200817 yr You forgot one. Has played in over 100 more games.Because Bay is the better player. Period.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.