September 10, 200818 yr Agreed. But looking at it independently, I think Obama lacks the preferred experience but has enough to suffice while Palin imo has no business being a candidate for VP. I don't think Palin has the experience to be president, but god willing, if McCain is elected, we won't have to find out. I think after 4 years as VP, Palin could make an interesting candidate for the POTUS though.
September 10, 200818 yr Palin defeated an extremely experience governor who had lenghty experience in both Washington and Juneau. Palin ran on a reform platform and her job approval rating if over 80 percent. The combined experience in the US Senate is well over 1.000 years. Yet, the US Senate has, along with the House, failed to: 1) pass an energy bill that makes any sense at all, 2) provide effective oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, or 3) secure our southern border against the invasion of an estimated 12 million illegal aliens. Washington insider experience is a problem not a solution.
September 10, 200818 yr Agreed. And, while some here don't find it so, I'll add frightening. Kind of "Crusades-like."For crying out loud, you guys are really reaching.
September 10, 200818 yr Palin defeated an extremely experience governor who had lenghty experience in both Washington and Juneau. Palin ran on a reform platform and her job approval rating if over 80 percent. The combined experience in the US Senate is well over 1.000 years. Yet, the US Senate has, along with the House, failed to: 1) pass an energy bill that makes any sense at all, 2) provide effective oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, or 3) secure our southern border against the invasion of an estimated 12 million illegal aliens. Washington insider experience is a problem not a solution. I find this interesting, as she is running with a 20 yr+ experienced Washington insider. Then, whenever anybody mentions that she would be "only a heartbeat away" from the presidency, that is brushed aside (not necessarily by you, Acesfull). It can't be both ways. Either she is a factor and must be considered, or she is not.
September 10, 200818 yr For crying out loud, you guys are really reaching. This is no more "reaching" then a multitude of comments that Obama has been called out for.
September 10, 200818 yr Just a reminder B.H. Obama is not running against Palin. Why does the left continue to compare their canidate to Palin? In my lifetime I have never seen a VP canidate cause this much of a stir. I guess McCain made a great choice if it worries you guys this much.
September 10, 200818 yr Just a reminder B.H. Obama is not running against Palin. Why does the left continue to compare their canidate to Palin? In my lifetime I have never seen a VP canidate cause this much of a stir. I guess McCain made a great choice if it worries you guys this much. You're right. No one is talking about McCain. The silence on that end is deafening.
September 10, 200818 yr I find this interesting, as she is running with a 20 yr+ experienced Washington insider. Then, whenever anybody mentions that she would be "only a heartbeat away" from the presidency, that is brushed aside (not necessarily by you, Acesfull). It can't be both ways. Either she is a factor and must be considered, or she is not.Obama has very little time in the US Senate and he has zero executive experience. Palin has no US Senate experience but she has solid executive experience. The US presidency is an executive position. I would be more comfortable with McCain in the White House on day one while Palin gains additional experience as VP but I would be much more comfortable with Palin in the White House on day one than Obama.
September 10, 200818 yr 1 1/2 years of running a state compared to 8 1/2 years of legislative experience and an understanding of how things work in Washington. Pretty easy for me really. 1 1/2 vs 2 1/2 of real experience, most of which time he was running for president. You have to ignore his state senate experience if you're talking about understanding how things work in Washington. Just as Palins mayoral duties must be ignored if we're talking real executive experience. I'm not comforted in either case.
September 10, 200818 yr Agreed. And, while some here don't find it so, I'll add frightening. Kind of "Crusades-like." Is there any indication she's governed with that mind set? If not I wouldn't be frightened as we've seen hyperbole from both sides this election.
September 10, 200818 yr I find this interesting, as she is running with a 20 yr+ experienced Washington insider. Then, whenever anybody mentions that she would be "only a heartbeat away" from the presidency, that is brushed aside (not necessarily by you, Acesfull). It can't be both ways. Either she is a factor and must be considered, or she is not. This one gets me everytime. Dems want to use this against her for her lack of experience but yet Obama is no more experience and they think he is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I don't think the Dems really cared to put Biden in office but he will also be a heartbeat away. Pelosi is two heartbeats away. You guys act like 72 equals one foot in the grave.
September 10, 200818 yr Just a reminder B.H. Obama is not running against Palin. Why does the left continue to compare their canidate to Palin? In my lifetime I have never seen a VP canidate cause this much of a stir. I guess McCain made a great choice if it worries you guys this much. The left has nothing to do with it, the left only points out Palins complete lack of experience and then the right comes back with the "Well, Obama doesn't have any either so she's a great candidate!" excuse.
September 10, 200818 yr The left has nothing to do with it, the left only points out Palins complete lack of experience and then the right comes back with the "Well, Obama doesn't have any either so she's a great candidate!" excuse. No, the left critisizing her for her lack of experience and claims she's only a heart beat away then refuses to acknowledge Obama's lack of experience. They are using the same arguements against Palin that the right (as well as Biden mind you) has used against Obama. The difference is it would take McCain dieing while in office for Palin's inexperience to come into play yet it would only take Obama winning the election.
September 10, 200818 yr No, the left critisizing her for her lack of experience and claims she's only a heart beat away then refuses to acknowledge Obama's lack of experience. They are using the same arguements against Palin that the right (as well as Biden mind you) has used against Obama. The difference is it would take McCain dieing while in office for Palin's inexperience to come into play yet it would only take Obama winning the election. I've recognized his lack of preferred experience but she basically has as close to none as one can have imo.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.