September 8, 200818 yr I would say that the MSNBC VP, Phil Griffin, who vouched for the impartiality of Olbermann as an anchor is on the hot seat if he has not already been given his walking papers. :lol: Some heads need to roll at MSNBC if they want to restore some of their credibility.
September 8, 200818 yr It at least appears that they are trying to become a more credible station. The same can't be said for Fox News :lol:.
September 8, 200818 yr It at least appears that they are trying to become a more credible station. The same can't be said for Fox News :lol:. :laugh: :laugh:
September 8, 200818 yr The tipping point appears to have come during the GOP convention when Olbermann criticized MSNBC for showing a Sept. 11-themed video prepared by the Republicans. ***You gotta love how free speech really isn't free. Oh well, doesn't really matter, corporate America will win out every time.
September 8, 200818 yr This may seem a bit odd to most of you, but I've always felt that political bashing to someone like Rush Limbaugh was a game, more a means of notoriety with an almost mercenary quality to it. Same with most of the so called "experts" on both sides of the issue whether it be Carville or Carson. However, I always sensed something in Oberman's voice that disturbed me. Especially when speaking of Bush, I could hear such a hatred in his speech that reminded me of Cindy Sheehan. It was easy to imagine him spitting as he spoke the words. I know he does not pretend to be neutral, but I think he is off the deep end.
September 8, 200818 yr The tipping point appears to have come during the GOP convention when Olbermann criticized MSNBC for showing a Sept. 11-themed video prepared by the Republicans. ***You gotta love how free speech really isn't free. Oh well, doesn't really matter, corporate America will win out every time. Dude can say whatever he wants, but NBC doesn't have to pay him for it. Did Corporate America have him arrested? Free speech is a right, but having a job from NBC isn't.
September 8, 200818 yr It at least appears that they are trying to become a more credible station. The same can't be said for Fox News :lol:. :laugh: :laugh: :lol::laugh::laugh::lol: Keep up the stellar contributions, guys.
September 8, 200818 yr Keep up the stellar contributions, guys. Yeah, because every single post in this thread has made enormous contributions. If you are going to pick out a couple of posts that you do not deem acceptable for the thread, why don't you choose all of them that do not directly contribute to the topic at hand? I do not disagree or think anything is wrong with 98's post. But how does it contribute to this thread?
September 8, 200818 yr Yeah, because every single post in this thread has made enormous contributions. If you are going to pick out a couple of posts that you do not deem acceptable for the thread, why don't you choose all of them that do not directly contribute to the topic at hand? I liked mine.
September 8, 200818 yr Yeah, because every single post in this thread has made enormous contributions. If you are going to pick out a couple of posts that you do not deem acceptable for the thread, why don't you choose all of them that do not directly contribute to the topic at hand? Actually, I wish I had picked a few more. But the fact that I did it now means that I have made a wasted post- if I have anything more, I'll PM you.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.