UK does not have an advantage at RB in any way. We should be calling it a push from here on out in this thread at that position.

He is a good QB , but he won't have any protection or clutch receivers.

 

Here's the thing, he should actually be pretty well protected because of two things, one the oline will be a bit better than you are giving them credit for. Also, U of L will protect him, if necessary with Tronzo or Bolen. Also, U of L's running will force defenses to play more honest.

I'd go with 2nd Team All SEC OT Garry Williams personally...

 

Come on dude, Eric Wood certainly has the nod as best Olineman in this game.

UK does not have an advantage at RB in any way. We should be calling it a push from here on out in this thread at that position.

 

I'll take Derrick Locke, Alfonso Smith, and Moncell Allen the edge.

DT1

Pryor vs. Heyman- I was thinkign Heyman was listed at DE, if so he can't hold a candle to Jarmon. Otherwise I concede this position even though a healthy Pryor is every bit as good if not better than Heyman.

 

DT2

Peters vs. Grady- No contest, Peters

 

DE1

Jarmon vs. Scott- Jarmon is the best defensive player playing in this game

 

DE2

Jenkins vs. Mitchell- Both have shown signs of dominance, neither stands out above the other. Push.

 

I definately see a slight advantage to UK..and based on how much better Jarmon and Peters are in their matchups maybe even more.

 

 

.... As for the OL push... C'MON! That ain't even close IMO!

:thumb:

I'll take Derrick Locke, Alfonso Smith, and Moncell Allen the edge.

 

That would be a bit un-founded....U of L has 2 NFL ball players in their backfield.

That would be a bit un-founded....U of L has 2 NFL ball players in their backfield.

 

Last year Anthony Allen was the next coming, I guess we'll see.

I'll take Derrick Locke, Alfonso Smith, and Moncell Allen the edge.

Not a chance.

Last year Anthony Allen was the next coming, I guess we'll see.

Didn't he break a 29 year old school record for rushing yards in a game? He just doesn't fit Krag's style of play, that's why he lost playing time and eventually transfered.

Last year Anthony Allen was the next coming, I guess we'll see.

 

I never said that....I knew he was lazy.....

Didn't he break a 29 year old school record for rushing yards in a game? He just doesn't fit Krag's style of play, that's why he lost playing time and eventually transfered.

 

Not the "whole story"..

Not the "whole story"..

I trust you on that, but would you disagree that he's a great runner when he applies himself but a back like Powell is still much more fitted for Krag's style of offense?

Not a chance.

 

At best it is a push for UL IMO.

I trust you on that, but would you disagree that he's a great runner when he applies himself but a back like Powell is still much more fitted for Krag's style of offense?

 

I would say he's good, but I hated his demeanor, and the "baby Bush" comparisons....Michael was a relentless worker. Anthony was a polar opposite....His success was more due to happenstance than skill.

At best it is a push for UL IMO.

At this time I can buy this.