Any kind of government sanctioned relationship. In other words, the government, by making laws, condones this as an acceptable lifestyle.

 

Just because the government does not out-law homosexual relationships, doesn't mean it condones it.

 

So you would be for a law banning homosexual relationships? As in having a boyfriend/boyfriend, girlfriend/girlfriend relationship.

I am not prepared to take a position but I added allow marriage as requested.

There is NO way I would touch this one. Even if I did take a position, I couldnt back it up!!

I find it horrifying that there are people who actually want to criminalize a victimless social choice.

I find it horrifying that there are people who actually want to criminalize a victimless social choice.

 

I actually tried to click the one above that but my computer screen jumped a little on me and it was too late.

 

Could a mod change my vote or clear my vote, please?

Edited July 21, 200818 yr by Wireman

I actually tried to click the one above that buy my computer screen jumped a little on me and it was too late.

 

I figured yours was a mistake wireman.

For some of the BGP legal experts, what is the difference between allowing a civil union and legal paperwork that can be drawn up now?

I have several views on this subject...and they are all "Biblical".

I have several views on this subject...and they are all "Biblical".

 

Isn't there a verse about giving Ceaser what is Ceaser's?

 

I don't agree with the lifestyle, but if they want to partner up they should get the same tax breaks. IMO that part has nothing to do with the religious side of the argument.

Isn't there a verse about giving Ceaser what is Ceaser's?

 

I don't agree with the lifestyle, but if they want to partner up they should get the same tax breaks. IMO that part has nothing to do with the religious side of the argument.

 

So, 8 adults want to partner up? They get the same tax breaks? Where is the line drawn? How can you even draw a line?

 

If you are going to allow 2 males, why not 3 males?

Why not a male and 2 women?

If you are going to allow 2 women, how do you say no to 3 women or 456,890 women?

 

At some point, either a) you have to draw NO lines and allow any and everything or b) you have to draw the line somewhere. One man, one woman is a good place to draw that line.

So, 8 adults want to partner up? They get the same tax breaks? Where is the line drawn? How can you even draw a line?

 

If you are going to allow 2 males, why not 3 males?

Why not a male and 2 women?

If you are going to allow 2 women, how do you say no to 3 women or 456,890 women?

 

At some point, either a) you have to draw NO lines and allow any and everything or b) you have to draw the line somewhere. One man, one woman is a good place to draw that line.

 

We already have polygamy laws on the books....

We already have polygamy laws on the books....

 

If you are going to allow homosexual relationships on what grounds are those laws legal or right in a society that allows homosexual relationships?

 

If you tell two males it is okay, why not 3 males?

If you tell two males it is okay, why not a father and two mothers?

 

The line has to be drawn some place. It was drawn at 2.

And it should be drawn at one mother and one father.

Plato...Give tax money compares to Homosexuals in which way?

So, 8 adults want to partner up? They get the same tax breaks? Where is the line drawn? How can you even draw a line?

 

If you are going to allow 2 males, why not 3 males?

Why not a male and 2 women?

If you are going to allow 2 women, how do you say no to 3 women or 456,890 women?

 

At some point, either a) you have to draw NO lines and allow any and everything or b) you have to draw the line somewhere. One man, one woman is a good place to draw that line.

 

2 People make a life commitment (and that term has to be used loosely these days unfortunately) to each other, imo they should get the tax break weather they are gay or straight.

If you are going to allow homosexual relationships on what grounds are those laws legal or right in a society that allows homosexual relationships?

 

If you tell two males it is okay, why not 3 males?

If you tell two males it is okay, why not a father and two mothers?

 

The line has to be drawn some place. It was drawn at 2.

And it should be drawn at one mother and one father.

 

Why?