December 19, 200718 yr Your absolutely right in that he does deserve it. He also deserves the lifetime suspension he is serving for the actions he took in gambling. It was HIS ACTIONS that got him suspended and HIS FAULT he, as a player, is not in the HOF. His accomplishments as the all time hit king is in there. Just not him as a player. What's worse, betting on your own team, or juicing up to hit home runs? If you ask me, juicing up. That's just plain out cheating..
December 19, 200718 yr What's worse, betting on your own team, or juicing up to hit home runs? If you ask me, juicing up. That's just plain out cheating.. While I may agree, that wasn't posted on every clubhouse wall in MLB. I know, not everything is...BUT, betting on baseball is... Keep in mind that betting on baseball games as Pete did has been illegal from day one. Yet performance enhancing drugs have only been illegal for a 15 years or so...
December 19, 200718 yr While I may agree, that wasn't posted on every clubhouse wall in MLB. I know, not everything is...BUT, betting on baseball is... Keep in mind that betting on baseball games as Pete did has been illegal from day one. Yet performance enhancing drugs have only been illegal for a 15 years or so... Illegal or not, using performance enhancing drugs is wrong. No matter if it's 1980 or 2008. It doesn't matter. Sure Pete bet on baseball and all, but he is one of the greatest, if not the greatest, players to ever go out on a baseball field. If I was voting for the Hall of Fame, I wouldn't look at what Pete did on his off the field life, betting, whatever else, I would look at those 4,000 hits and how the man hustled every single play that he was out there..
December 19, 200718 yr Illegal or not, using performance enhancing drugs is wrong. No matter if it's 1980 or 2008. It doesn't matter. Sure Pete bet on baseball and all, but he is one of the greatest, if not the greatest, players to ever go out on a baseball field. If I was voting for the Hall of Fame, I wouldn't look at what Pete did on his off the field life, betting, whatever else, I would look at those 4,000 hits and how the man hustled every single play that he was out there.. No one has said it isn't wrong. I'm just saying betting on baseball is MUCH more severe...IMO. (and a lot of other peoples opinion's too)
December 19, 200718 yr What's worse, betting on your own team, or juicing up to hit home runs? If you ask me, juicing up. That's just plain out cheating.. So, breaking of the rules clearly stated in every dugout in the ML's means nothing to you as a voter.
December 19, 200718 yr So, breaking of the rules clearly stated in every dugout in the ML's means nothing to you as a voter. No, it is wrong, I agree. All I'm saying is if people get into the hall by using performance enhancing drugs, and Pete doesn't go in, then that's wrong..
December 19, 200718 yr No, it is wrong, I agree. All I'm saying is if people get into the hall by using performance enhancing drugs, and Pete doesn't go in, then that's wrong.. I agree, to an extent. Pete had many, many chances to make this right. He chose to deny, deny, deny some more and when the evidence was OVERWHELMINGLY against him...confess and write a book. It will depend on how some of these guys handle it. IMO, Barry Bonds deserves to be in the HOF as much as Pete because he's a jerk as well... Baseball wise, they both should've been/should be first ballot HOF'ers...
December 19, 200718 yr No, it is wrong, I agree. All I'm saying is if people get into the hall by using performance enhancing drugs, and Pete doesn't go in, then that's wrong.. I wouldn't disagree with you there. But the problem is, Pete accepted the ban. I am assuming that none of today's players will take the bad advice that Pete took and ACCEPT the ban. Remember, he AGREED TO THE BAN. My personal opinion, he couldn't imagine the HOF without him and his ego thought he was bigger than the game and no way they could ban him for life.
December 19, 200718 yr I agree, to an extent. Pete had many, many chances to make this right. He chose to deny, deny, deny some more and when the evidence was OVERWHELMINGLY against him...confess and write a book. It will depend on how some of these guys handle it. IMO, Barry Bonds deserves to be in the HOF as much as Pete because he's a jerk as well... Baseball wise, they both should've been/should be first ballot HOF'ers... Guys who have juiced up have denied, and denied, and denied some more. If Bonds goes into the Hall, with him denying using roids, you can't tell me that's any different. If guys can lie about that, then so can Pete. I'll admit it was wrong, but I forgive the guy. Without Pete Rose, I doubt the Reds have those nice World Series rings..
December 19, 200718 yr I have a question for anyone who has an awswer. Did Pete bet on baseball when he played the game?
December 19, 200718 yr Guys who have juiced up have denied, and denied, and denied some more. If Bonds goes into the Hall, with him denying using roids, you can't tell me that's any different. If guys can lie about that, then so can Pete. I'll admit it was wrong, but I forgive the guy. Without Pete Rose, I doubt the Reds have those nice World Series rings.. But until the Mitchell Report, it was all hearsay. Now, it's presented as factual, same as the Dowd Report was.
December 19, 200718 yr I have a question for anyone who has an awswer. Did Pete bet on baseball when he played the game? I'm not sure you could get that answer if you asked Pete himself...
December 19, 200718 yr Point being he bet on Baseball as a manager. He should be in because of what he did on the field not off or after his playing days.
December 19, 200718 yr Point being he bet on Baseball as a manager. He should be in because of what he did on the field not off or after his playing days. Zero integrity as a manager leads one to believe he had zero integrity as a player. Problem is, like I said in my first post, you can no longer believe anything Pete says. We could go back and forth all day. Bottom line, Pete's the reason Pete is not in the HOF. Pete agreed to the lifetime ban and now Pete's realizing he's not bigger than the game.
December 19, 200718 yr I have a question for anyone who has an awswer. Did Pete bet on baseball when he played the game? I'm not sure about that, but I heard him say in a interview once that he only bet on his team to win, never to lose....not that that makes it right.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.