onetoya Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 I don't keep up with 1A football all that much, but did Hazard just send a message with this score or am I thinking the LCA is much better than they are?
TheLegends64 Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 To much speed for Hazard and too many turnovers for LCA. Hopefully these teams will rematch at LCA in the semi's.
oldrambler Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 I don't keep up with 1A football all that much, but did Hazard just send a message with this score or am I thinking the LCA is much better than they are? From what I know about L.C.A. onetoya .....Hazard just sent a BIG message :eek:. L.C.A. is a very good football team. Arguably the best team on Raceland's schedule this season. JMO Congrats to Hazard on the win.
AverageJoesGym Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 I think LCA was just exposed as a pretender in 1A.
onetoya Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 I don't know if that's the case but by looking at the field of 1A teams Beechwood, Hazard, Fulton City, Dayton, and Pikeville are teams to watch. To be honest it looks like its Beechwood's Championship to lose IMO.
AverageJoesGym Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 I don't know if that's the case but by looking at the field of 1A teams Beechwood, Hazard, Fulton City, Dayton, and Pikeville are teams to watch. To be honest it looks like its Beechwood's Championship to lose IMO. I never said that Hazard wasn't that good. To say that it is Beechwood's title to lose would be saying exactly that--and that is what you said in effect, isn't it?
onetoya Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 I never said that Hazard wasn't that good. To say that it is Beechwood's title to lose would be saying exactly that--and that is what you said in effect, isn't it? It looks as if Beechwood has it wrapped up on paper but anything can happen on the field. Besides you were talking about LCA being a pretender not Hazard;)
AverageJoesGym Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 It looks as if Beechwood has it wrapped up on paper but anything can happen on the field. Besides you were talking about LCA being a pretender not Hazard;) Hey then we can save everyone a bunch of travel expenses and just go ahead and CROWN BEECHWOOD. Everyone in favor raise their hands.......
AverageJoesGym Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 So if LCA would have beaten Hazard they would have been a more legitimate contender? Is that what you were trying to say?????? I can see that it was.
Cat_n_the_Hat Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 Look's to me like the east is wide open.....Lynn Camp is really missing roskoph now...
onetoya Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 So if LCA would have beaten Hazard they would have been a more legitimate contender? Is that what you were trying to say?????? I can see that it was. I think you need help:creepy:
Leonidas Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 I think LCA was just exposed as a pretender in 1A. Agreed. Overrated!!!
AverageJoesGym Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 I think you need help:creepy: It appears that if LCA would have won you would have thought Beechwood would have a legitimate contender but since Hazard won then no one else has a chance. Read your post that is exactly what you were insinuating.
kypride Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 On the one hand I heard L.C.A. had 6 turnovers and you just can't win like that. On the other hand every time L.C.A. has played someone as good as them they have lost 0-3.
Recommended Posts