September 8, 200719 yr That outfit is far from ridiculous... You haven't seen the outfit, as it was presented.
September 8, 200719 yr Pretty sure they said Southwest does not have a dress code policy for their flights....
September 8, 200719 yr Pretty sure they said Southwest does not have a dress code policy for their flights.... That is exactly what was said. There is no company policy about it, so the guy couldn't have been following policy that doesn't exist. :thumb:
September 9, 200719 yr Did I hear right that the flight attendant named "Keith" was the one who had the problem with the outfit? Doesn't that sort of end this discussion?
September 9, 200719 yr Author :thumb: Can't figure out why this is even a question. She probably should have been arrested for indecent exposure. Good job Southwest! :ylsuper: Don't be silly, there was nothing wrong with what she was wearing.
September 9, 200719 yr Don't be silly, there was nothing wrong with what she was wearing. RTS, hold your hat - we agree. How can anyone say there was anything indecent about what she was wearing? Short skirt? Yes. Indecent? Not by society's standards.
September 9, 200719 yr The problem for those arguing that SWA was correct is that this young lady passed 50 other SWA employees before she boarded the plane. Unless she had her legs hiked up over the seat in front of her for God and everyone to see, one flight attendant with a wild hair can't suddenly become the voice of SWA.
September 9, 200719 yr Author RTS, hold your hat - we agree. How can anyone say there was anything indecent about what she was wearing? Short skirt? Yes. Indecent? Not by society's standards.:thumb: :thumb: :thumb: You know what could be freezing over. :lol:
September 9, 200719 yr The problem for those arguing that SWA was correct is that this young lady passed 50 other SWA employees before she boarded the plane. Unless she had her legs hiked up over the seat in front of her for God and everyone to see, one flight attendant with a wild hair can't suddenly become the voice of SWA. :thumb:
September 9, 200719 yr The problem for those arguing that SWA was correct is that this young lady passed 50 other SWA employees before she boarded the plane. Unless she had her legs hiked up over the seat in front of her for God and everyone to see, one flight attendant with a wild hair can't suddenly become the voice of SWA. That's Southwest's problem isn't it?
September 9, 200719 yr Did I hear right that the flight attendant named "Keith" was the one who had the problem with the outfit? Doesn't that sort of end this discussion? We're not going there.
September 9, 200719 yr Don't be silly, there was nothing wrong with what she was wearing. Again, if you read the article about it, she was wearing the clothes in a different way than you see pictured. Maybe "arrested" was an over-statement; but I feel strongly that it wasn't appropriate for the circumstances.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.