To quote Deuce from another thread...

 

I'm ready for the argument about how UGA's loss to WVU by 3 was a blowout but Michigan's loss by 3 to Ohio State was "just by a field goal".

 

This should be good...

:lol:

 

You dont agree that UGA got handled for the majority of that game last year? The difference between the UM loss to tO$U and that one is that game was competitive the whole game...At no point in the UM/tO$U could you say, "Wow, UM is getting it handed to them." You cant say the same for the UGA/WVU game, IMHO.

:lol:

 

You dont agree that UGA got handled for the majority of that game last year? The difference between the UM loss to tO$U and that one is that game was competitive the whole game...At no point in the UM/tO$U could you say, "Wow, UM is getting it handed to them." You cant say the same for the UGA/WVU game, IMHO.

Not even close for the majority of the game. WVU jumped out early and held on the rest of the game by using a fake punt because they felt UGA would win.

The OSU/UM game was a 14 point game at the half and so was the Georiga/WVU game. Whats the difference?

The answer is no.............. Because UK will beat Clemson and win the Music City Bowl!!!!!!!!!

The answer is no.............. Because UK will beat Clemson and win the Music City Bowl!!!!!!!!!

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

 

I like that answer! :thumb:

 

(And BTW, I agree.)

Not even close for the majority of the game.

 

But you do agree that UGA was handled fairly easily, for a PORTION of that game?

But you do agree that UGA was handled fairly easily, for a PORTION of that game?

What does that have to do with the game as a whole. I only watched the first half of the Rutgers/UL game. Imagine my surprise the next morning when I see UL lost.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

 

I like that answer! :thumb:

 

(And BTW, I agree.)

 

Seriously? I'm hoping that UK's defense can hold Clemson's running game to less than 300 yards....

But you do agree that UGA was handled fairly easily, for a PORTION of that game?

 

I would say so. When your down 28-0 it means that you were getting handled pretty easy at some point.

Seriously? I'm hoping that UK's defense can hold Clemson's running game to less than 300 yards....

 

Clemson does have a pretty solid run game, but so does UK (depending on which R. Little shows up)...The key will definitley be how well UK can stop the run, because I believe that Woodson and Co. can score on Clemson.

I would say so. When your down 28-0 it means that you were getting handled pretty easy at some point.

:thumb:

What does that have to do with the game as a whole.

 

As NHS BD said, if you're down 28-0 at any point, you're getting your stuff handed to you, no way around it.

As NHS BD said, if you're down 28-0 at any point, you're getting your stuff handed to you, no way around it.

But isn't that why they play 4 quarters? WVU handled UG for a portion but when your down 28-0 and come back to make it a 38-35 game, wouldn't you say UG handed WVU's stuff to them for a portion of the game as well?

But isn't that why they play 4 quarters? WVU handled UG for a portion but when your down 28-0 and come back to make it a 38-35 game, wouldn't you say UG handed WVU's stuff to them for a portion of the game as well?

 

WVU went into cruise control, as many teams do when up four scores. UGA's comeback was not nearly as impressive as WVU jumping out to that lead, and anybody that watched that game SHOULD agree...Whether they will or not, that's their choce.