The 6A AP Poll Trinity is 5th!

 

Well this isn't the 6A AP Poll.

Well this isn't the 6A AP Poll.

 

That is the truth.

The 6A AP Poll Trinity is 5th!

 

Whoever makes these ranking must be from Louisville?

Nope. And here’s the thing you aren’t considering. To put anyone in front of Trinity, you have to believe that team would do better than Trinity with the schedule that Trinity has played. Obviously Male fits the bill. However, there aren’t four teams in Kentucky that evidence shows would do better.

I wouldn’t use AP poll as standard. Warren Central received multiple votes, and hasn’t won a game last year or this year. That’s just one example of errors in the poll.

When rankings have nothing to do with how one team actually preforms on the field, is it really fair to all of the other teams, that are being measured by how they preform on the field?

When rankings have nothing to do with how one team actually preforms on the field, is it really fair to all of the other teams, that are being measured by how they preform on the field?

But are we judging actual performance or simple wins and losees?

0- and whatever says a lot about how a team is playing on the field.

In which case I suppose the Rocks should follow the NKY 6A method and schedule the school for the blind and a bunch of middle schools.

 

Oh well. I suppose we should write off this season, since clearly T has never come back from anything like this ever before to convincingly win a state title. :idunno:

0- and whatever says a lot about how a team is playing on the field.

So schedule doesn’t matter? Simply wins and losses?

Oh well. I suppose we should write off this season, since clearly T has never come back from anything like this ever before to convincingly win a state title. :idunno:

 

I've thought about the image below quite often this week as we've seen hand-wringing about an 0-4 club being ranked.

 

Trinity.pdf

I've thought about the image below quite often this week as we've seen hand-wringing about an 0-4 club being ranked.

 

[ATTACH]67089[/ATTACH]

 

 

Exactly, had I not seen something nearly identical to this in the past I would be more concerned.