You'll never get that call when you don't even try to box out.

 

That may be true but it still doesn't change the the fact, Meeks pushed in the back to get the rebound.

cry me a river! no call no foul!

 

That's ignorant, that's like saying if you don't get caught committing a crime no crime was committed. Lmbo. I'm not crying, just stated a fact.

That's ignorant, that's like saying if you don't get caught committing a crime no crime was committed. Lmbo. I'm not crying, just stated a fact.

 

It's been a week.... let it go

That's ignorant, that's like saying if you don't get caught committing a crime no crime was committed. Lmbo. I'm not crying, just stated a fact.

Mommy he pushed in the back and the ref didn't call it....... sounds like crying to me. LOL. It's ok man. Game over move on.

Shove plus laying on the back and reaching over the Oregon player to grab the rebound. But all that is on Oregon. The first free throw miss rebound and failure to box out was ridiculous. The second one when Meeks got the rebound to still not fight hard to box out ... cry all you want about wanting an over the back call ... you didn't fight hard enough to box out and get the rebound or you get that over the back call or the rebound - one or the other.

 

The definite foul was the slight push in the back. The fact he reached over him does not make it a foul. Good or bad if it's not blatant it's often not getting called in that type of situation especially when there is no blockout attempt.

That may be true but it still doesn't change the the fact, Meeks pushed in the back to get the rebound.

Doesn't matter. Box out and you have 2 free throws to tie/ win the game. Inexcusable.

Where I think there was a missed call was on Meeks when he was the shooter. Unless the NCAA rule is different from NFHS the shooter cannot cross the plane of the back side of the FT line before the ball hits the rim. Meeks clearly did.

Mommy he pushed in the back and the ref didn't call it....... sounds like crying to me. LOL. It's ok man. Game over move on.

 

A fact is a fact, your opinion of it does not change it, you move on man.

Doesn't matter. Box out and you have 2 free throws to tie/ win the game. Inexcusable.

True, I agree.

A fact is a fact, your opinion of it does not change it, you move on man.

I totally agree, it was the officials opinion that Meeks did not foul. It was a FACT that no foul was called. If you continue to sulk from the UK loss (if that's the problem?), it's going to be a long off season for you buddy. An yes.....I am moving on......to watch my boys play Gonzaga for the title Monday night. Take it easy man, it's all fun and games.

Where I think there was a missed call was on Meeks when he was the shooter. Unless the NCAA rule is different from NFHS the shooter cannot cross the plane of the back side of the FT line before the ball hits the rim. Meeks clearly did.

 

I said that when it happened, that unless there's been a rule change that I don't know about Meeks had a violation there and the ball should have been to Oregon.

I totally agree, it was the officials opinion that Meeks did not foul. It was a FACT that no foul was called. If you continue to sulk from the UK loss (if that's the problem?), it's going to be a long off season for you buddy. An yes.....I am moving on......to watch my boys play Gonzaga for the title Monday night. Take it easy man, it's all fun and games.

 

You are the one that made this an issue brother, no a foul was not called, that is a fact, whether or not that there was not one just because the official did not call it, and Oregon did not block out DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT that he pushed in the back. Replay shows he did, that's A FACT. That was the Point I made in my original post along with my OPINION that NC gets away with this stuff all the time. It had nothing to do with my opinion of the UK loss, another debatable subject. Enjoy the victory

You are the one that made this an issue brother, no a foul was not called, that is a fact, whether or not that there was not one just because the official did not call it, and Oregon did not block out DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT that he pushed in the back. Replay shows he did, that's A FACT. That was the Point I made in my original post along with my OPINION that NC gets away with this stuff all the time. It had nothing to do with my opinion of the UK loss, another debatable subject. Enjoy the victory

Not an issue man. Good ole barbershop debate. Good day.

The definite foul was the slight push in the back. The fact he reached over him does not make it a foul. Good or bad if it's not blatant it's often not getting called in that type of situation especially when there is no blockout attempt.

 

This. You NEVER see an aggressive boxout called, so stick your butt out and block him out. At the very least, give it the old college try. You've got four seconds left in your season.