March 31, 20179 yr Author How so? You gave your opinion, I gave mine. We don't agree so you just bail? Got it. :thumb: You made statements against my statements and ignored my questions. What's the point? LB answers questions. Have a good one. :thumb:
March 31, 20179 yr Help me with the leaks. Where would they come from? Isn't everyone in the know a Trump ally or not? Leaks always confuse me because I don't understand the source and if the source is credible then when stuff is leaked shouldn't we be as concerned about the leaked information as well as the source? It's like people pick and choose when they are for or against leaks. There are many reports that the leaks are coming from Obama loyalists still employed by the current administration.
March 31, 20179 yr Author There are thousands of career people in Washington in intelligence and non intelligence roles loyal to different people . I agree we should be worried about both. But neither should be ignored. I agree. And that helps with the understanding. Lots of cooks in the kitchen. How possible would it be to get rid of the leaks and with the technology the government has at its ready how do leaks keep coming out?
March 31, 20179 yr You made statements against my statements and ignored my questions. What's the point? LB answers questions. Have a good one. :thumb: If those are legitimate questions, I missed them. Seemed like snide remarks. Ask a legit question, I'll be glad to answer them.
March 31, 20179 yr Author There are many reports that the leaks are coming from Obama loyalists still employed by the current administration. Wasn't one of his moves firing all people tied to the Obama administration and loyalists? Can't he identify those people and fire them?
March 31, 20179 yr Wasn't one of his moves firing all people tied to the Obama administration and loyalists? Can't he identify those people and fire them? He should be able to "thin the herd" if they can be identified.
March 31, 20179 yr Author If those are legitimate questions, I missed them. Seemed like snide remarks. Ask a legit question, I'll be glad to answer them. I'm sorry you feel they are snide remarks. This is the new politics forum. Every question I have asked has been a true question searching for an earnest reply and will continue to be.
March 31, 20179 yr I'm sorry you feel they are snide remarks. This is the new politics forum. Every question I have asked has been a true question searching for an earnest reply and will continue to be. If you read them again, I think you could see where one could think that. No biggie. I like good discussion.
March 31, 20179 yr Author If you read them again, I think you could see where one could think that. No biggie. I like good discussion. I thought they were fair questions that I truly wanted an answer to. I understand if part history taints my intention.
March 31, 20179 yr Author He should be able to "thin the herd" if they can be identified. I don't have an issue with that. I'd do the same thing. Especially if the leaks are out of hand.
March 31, 20179 yr Author What are people's opinion of Flynn if he is indeed wanting immunity? Why would Trump tweet that is the right thing to do? Isn't immunity reserved for people who committed a crime?
April 1, 20179 yr I agree. And that helps with the understanding. Lots of cooks in the kitchen. How possible would it be to get rid of the leaks and with the technology the government has at its ready how do leaks keep coming out? It might not be easy but there should be a series of stings of entrapment.
April 1, 20179 yr It might not be easy but there should be a series of stings of entrapment. Mandatory lie detector tests.
April 1, 20179 yr What are people's opinion of Flynn if he is indeed wanting immunity? Why would Trump tweet that is the right thing to do? Isn't immunity reserved for people who committed a crime? Heard some comments today on this. 1. The only reason you give someone immunity is if you think someone higher in the food chain committed a criminal act. So you give Flynn immunity if you think Trump committed a crime, because he is the only person higher up the food chain than where Flynn was.Flynn gets immunity to try and get evidence on Trump. If you don't think Trump committed a crime, then there is no reason to give Flynn immunity because Flynn is the highest person you are going after. 2. Flynn himself said the only you give someone immunity if they committed a crime. He said that in reference to one of the Hillary Clinton accusations/investigations - that she should only need immunity to testify if she committed a crime..
April 1, 20179 yr Mandatory lie detector tests. Lie detector tests are a joke. Anyone with a brain can beat them now.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.