November 21, 20169 yr White nationalists is a type of group. I don't believe there is an actual White Nationalist Party in the US (there is in England, I believe). All of the traditional neo-Nazi/white power groups would fall under "white nationalists" umbrella. So you've heard of white nationalist groups - KKK, Aryan Nation, etc. Never heard of them referred to as "white nationalists". It's always been "white supremacists". Is this a kinder, gentler term coined by the Left?
November 21, 20169 yr Alt Right, White nationalists...I am having trouble keeping up with all these groups that I have never heard of that have sprung up since Trump got involved in politics...
November 21, 20169 yr I am white and I like the idea of Trump putting America and Americans first. Heck, I may be a white nationalist and not even know it...:lol2:
November 22, 20169 yr Author Never heard of them referred to as "white nationalists". It's always been "white supremacists". Is this a kinder, gentler term coined by the Left? That's what they call themselves.
November 22, 20169 yr I have never even heard of a white nationalist. I'm with you but I have to admit, I didn't realize there were more groups besides KKK and I thought they were down to a few thousand members. I wonder if it's kind of like the BLM movement. Not sure though.
November 22, 20169 yr [video=youtube;1o6-bi3jlxk] These are the people for which the president-elect's chief strategist proudly claims his website has become a platform. But, liberal media etc. etc. etc.
November 22, 20169 yr One of Mr Trump's attorneys being used to help immigration policy is the AG from Kansas. He helped write SB 1070 in AZ. He is going to be a target due to his reported ties to a group that is on the SPLC hate group list. I believe the acronym is FAIR and he does legal work for them. This issue isn't going to go away.
November 22, 20169 yr Author I'm with you but I have to admit, I didn't realize there were more groups besides KKK and I thought they were down to a few thousand members. I wonder if it's kind of like the BLM movement. Not sure though. White nationalists have been around a lot longer than BLM. BLM isn't a group built on hate and terrorism. White nationalists are coming out of hiding and people need to pay attention to who they are and who they have ties to. They aren't hiding anything anymore. People act like this is the first time that the groups have had ties to high ranking officials in the government. I'm not sure why people are so quick to dismiss their possible links to the White House and to future policies here in the US. The belief that these people are deep off in cornfields with hoods on their heads is naive. They are in casual business suits having meetings with government officials, CEOs and Wall Street investors.
November 22, 20169 yr Some BGPers' reputed ignorance is laughable. Think what you want. I don't pay attention to them anymore than I pay attention to the Black Panthers or Farrakhan and his bunch of racists. They aren't worth my time.
November 22, 20169 yr Author Think what you want. I don't pay attention to them anymore than I pay attention to the Black Panthers or Farrakhan and his bunch of racists. They aren't worth my time. Would you pay attention to Farakkhan if he was named Chief Strategist or would you still not pay any attention to him? And again, the New Black Panthers aren't a legitimate group. Farakkhan and the Nation of Islam is. The KKK is. The White Nationalist movement is. Why do you insist on lumping the New Black Panthers in with credible groups that have actual plans, true organization, followers, monetary support and structure? The Bloods and Crips are more credible organizations than the New Black Panthers. I don't understand why people insist on mentioning them with all of these other groups.
November 22, 20169 yr Would you pay attention to Farakkhan if he was named Chief Strategist or would you still not pay any attention to him? And again, the New Black Panthers aren't a legitimate group. Farakkhan and the Nation of Islam is. The KKK is. The White Nationalist movement is. Why do you insist on lumping the New Black Panthers in with credible groups that have actual plans, true organization, followers, monetary support and structure? The Bloods and Crips are more credible organizations than the New Black Panthers. I don't understand why people insist on mentioning them with all of these other groups. As I said in another thread, Valerie Jarrett ring a bell? As long as the New Black Panthers are in the news, they will be lumped in.
November 22, 20169 yr Author As I said in another thread, Valerie Jarrett ring a bell? As long as the New Black Panthers are in the news, they will be lumped in. I'm currently awaiting your answer to my Jarrett question. Another double standard then. Only fear mongering allowed is from your side. Duly noted.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.