October 13, 20169 yr You sure? I'm quite sure. I'll venture a guess (and that's all it is) that there are more racists in the Republican Party than in the Democratic Party, but in no way shape or form do I think it's even close to most in either case.
October 13, 20169 yr I'm quite sure. I'll venture a guess (and that's all it is) that there are more racists in the Republican Party than in the Democratic Party, but in no way shape or form do I think it's even close to most in either case. You may be surprised. Could be they are hiding in plain sight.
October 15, 20169 yr How is she different that the average person? She has a long-standing political career…. global influence, money, power to name a few. I would like to think Hilary is innocent based upon her otherwise decent career… but literally no idea… The Politics of Personal Destruction, the Clinton's gave their method of campaigning a name way back in Arkansas. Ask Mike Huckabee.
October 15, 20169 yr The Politics of Personal Destruction, the Clinton's gave their method of campaigning a name way back in Arkansas. Ask Mike Huckabee. What, lol? Holy moly, Hilary is the devil, remember? Anyway, like others… I’ve checked out of the political posts for now Sportsaholic Mamaw because it borders on the ridiculous…. and also… I can’t seem to tell if folks are joking around with me or ridiculing me when I post (LOL)
October 15, 20169 yr What, lol? Holy moly, Hilary is the devil, remember? Anyway, like others… I’ve checked out of the political posts for now Sportsaholic Mamaw because it borders on the ridiculous…. and also… I can’t seem to tell if folks are joking around with me or ridiculing me when I post (LOL) The Politics of Personal Destruction was a Clinton method in Arkansas. Ask Mike Huckabee. The Clintons have always used this phrase of victimization, somewhat like another favorite phrase of theirs, A Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, to take the heat off of their misdeeds. Believe it or not, look it up. The mud is never to fall on them, even though they start slinging it first. I would never ridicule you on a subject so serious. I never said Hillary is a devil.
October 15, 20169 yr One poster even said more people should vote him because of his bus comments. I don't think he ever explained his reasoning, despite several requesting an explanation. There is never a reason for language such as that. My only problem with the entire discussion on here was that I did not get any inference that he had acted upon these statements.
October 15, 20169 yr There is never a reason for language such as that. My only problem with the entire discussion on here was that I did not get any inference that he had acted upon these statements. I know, right? It sounds so far fetched doesn't it? I mean we're talking about Donald Trump. It's obviously nothing more than a smear campaign because Donald is as morally wholesome as they come.
October 15, 20169 yr There is never a reason for language such as that. My only problem with the entire discussion on here was that I did not get any inference that he had acted upon these statements. More examples of smear... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJAsLUKb9eA
October 15, 20169 yr I know, right? It sounds so far fetched doesn't it? I mean we're talking about Donald Trump. It's obviously nothing more than a smear campaign because Donald is as morally wholesome as they come. I'm 66 years old, and I have yet to find anyone who is perfect, not Donald Trump nor the Clintons. I'm not being facetious or as one poster recently insulted me with, Lala Land. But one thing I do know, Trump is more likely to appoint Supreme Court Justices that align more closely to my beliefs, Trump is more likely to limit regulations regarding the EPA because if they carry through with Obama's, our utility bills will at least double. And that comes from my utility company. Call your own if you haven't already. And I also like Trump's tax plan and would hope that encourages companies to bring back the 3 or 4 trillion dollars parked in offshore banks. It is my hope that Trump will surround himself with knowledgeable persons and also in his cabinet to help the U.S. deal with the very dangerous situations in the Baltic States, the Mideast, China and the South China Sea, Iran's growing threats against our Navy. These are the topics I would rather be discussing NOW and not the mud slinging of the last few weeks. But topics keep changing back to things that have nothing to do with our welfare and safety. And you just proved my point about mud slinging by posting that item while I had to leave.
October 15, 20169 yr More examples of smear... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJAsLUKb9eA And that was a man, maybe before or between marriages, who was not intending to ever run for office. Not the example I would want my sons to display but he was a private citizen. There are thousands of tapes like this I guess because he ran with the jet setting crowd. What Is your point in posting that?
October 16, 20169 yr I'm 66 years old, and I have yet to find anyone who is perfect, not Donald Trump nor the Clintons. I'm not being facetious or as one poster recently insulted me with, Lala Land. But one thing I do know, Trump is more likely to appoint Supreme Court Justices that align more closely to my beliefs, Trump is more likely to limit regulations regarding the EPA because if they carry through with Obama's, our utility bills will at least double. And that comes from my utility company. Call your own if you haven't already. And I also like Trump's tax plan and would hope that encourages companies to bring back the 3 or 4 trillion dollars parked in offshore banks. It is my hope that Trump will surround himself with knowledgeable persons and also in his cabinet to help the U.S. deal with the very dangerous situations in the Baltic States, the Mideast, China and the South China Sea, Iran's growing threats against our Navy. These are the topics I would rather be discussing NOW and not the mud slinging of the last few weeks. But topics keep changing back to things that have nothing to do with our welfare and safety. And you just proved my point about mud slinging by posting that item while I had to leave. Forgiving the imperfections of others is one thing and admirable, but turning around to make that person your president is altogether something else. You might have it in your heart to forgive the thief who broke into your home, but I'm guessing that you wouldn't be so quick to turn your keys over to them to housesit for you while on vacation. By the same token would you trust The Donald to babysit your grandkids, and if your answer is no, then how would you explain to your grandkids that you voted for someone with the character not suitable to be trusted alone with them? This is not me taking the moral high ground, but finding it to be an amusing illogical contradiction from folks who usually do.
October 16, 20169 yr And that was a man, maybe before or between marriages, who was not intending to ever run for office. Not the example I would want my sons to display but he was a private citizen. There are thousands of tapes like this I guess because he ran with the jet setting crowd. What Is your point in posting that? Puzzling that you should have to ask, but this is profiling the character of the person who is tops on your list of available choices running for president, and while you're not convinced of any wrong doing on his part, it was intended to help display to you in his own words when he says... "Can you imagine of how controversial I'd be, you think about him with the women, how about me with the women, can you imagine?" Whether this was years ago or whether or not he was planning on running, his character has been on full display for years, and I've detected no inference that there's been any change with it. Personally I'm not even judging his playboy activities, but find it amusing that a right winged conservative is suddenly OK with this guy simply because he's running as a Republican. I guarantee that you'd view him quite differently if running under any other party, and he is only using the Republican party anyhow because of the 2 party stranglehold, not to mention that he is no more a typical Republican than the man on the moon. My objection with him started long before he even began running for president. It was apparent for years to anyone with a pulse that he's been an over-the-top spoiled rotten cringe-worthy smarmy arrogant megalomaniac nutball, but somehow now he's qualified to be our Commander in Chief. Right. Think back to what you thought of this guy before he faked you out and put an "R" next to his name.
October 16, 20169 yr Forgiving the imperfections of others is one thing and admirable, but turning around to make that person your president is altogether something else. You might have it in your heart to forgive the thief who broke into your home, but I'm guessing that you wouldn't be so quick to turn your keys over to them to housesit for you while on vacation. By the same token would you trust The Donald to babysit your grandkids, and if your answer is no, then how would you explain to your grandkids that you voted for someone with the character not suitable to be trusted alone with them? This is not me taking the moral high ground, but finding it to be an amusing illogical contradiction from folks who usually do. We were robbed, and the loser threatened my husband's life and emptied the cash register, I would have shot him if I had a gun. It was a horrible experience, thanks for reminding me. That loser sat in jail for 4 months and was released come spring and banned from the state of Kentucky. Are you kidding, my grandkids are for him all on their own, they don't like Hillary's tax plan either. They know he is not as great a threat to the independence of our country as Hillary is with her open borders and globalization ideas. They are more surprised that I haven't made more comments about his language because they know what I will not tolerate in my presence.You would never be charged with taking the high moral ground with that last video. High moral ground? I think not.
October 16, 20169 yr We were robbed, and the loser threatened my husband's life and emptied the cash register, I would have shot him if I had a gun. It was a horrible experience, thanks for reminding me. That loser sat in jail for 4 months and was released come spring and banned from the state of Kentucky. Are you kidding, my grandkids are for him all on their own, they don't like Hillary's tax plan either. They know he is not as great a threat to the independence of our country as Hillary is with her open borders and globalization ideas. They are more surprised that I haven't made more comments about his language because they know what I will not tolerate in my presence.You would never be charged with taking the high moral ground with that last video. High moral ground? I think not. I had no idea that you had been robbed, and the example was used as a hypothetical. Sorry to reopen that wound for you. I'll assume that guy has never house sat for you. Regardless of your grandkids supporting him, you'd be alright leaving him alone, for example, with a 14 year old granddaughter? How does the last video reflect on my morality? I'm not catching the connection. Not suggesting that I'm so perfect, but what's that got to do with me? I broke down some logical questioning, you danced around it not really answering anything, much like the Donald does.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.