October 11, 201610 yr Why have none of you fair minded posters on here started a thread about this? Now I have been working all day today in Cake Town, and away from the Internet for the most part and news and even I have heard about this. Wikileaks Releases Another 1,1
October 11, 201610 yr Author And for all the Catholics she never forgot you guys: LEAKED EMAIL: Clinton Team Bashes 'Backward' Catholics | The Sean Hannity Show
October 11, 201610 yr Author More on contact with the DOJ: Clinton camp appeared to have contacts with DOJ on email case | TheHill
October 11, 201610 yr As I said in another thread, the Left will excuse and condone and the media will say, "nothing to see here".
October 11, 201610 yr And for all the Catholics she never forgot you guys: LEAKED EMAIL: Clinton Team Bashes 'Backward' Catholics | The Sean Hannity Show If you're not a Catholic, you might've missed this but it's something those familiar with the state of things picked up. When someone talks about "traditional Catholics", they mean something very specific. Sometimes referred to by other Catholics as "trads", it means people with strict adherence to social teaching, typically Latin Mass attendees, and those that are generally unhappy with the state of the Church since Vatican II. In fact, in that e-mail exchange they refer to "trads" as a bastardization of the faith, which as a Latin mass attendee myself, I find mostly amusing. It's a fun headline to whip up the angry conservatives, but it's a re-writing of the exchange. Believe me, I have no illusions about what a lot of progressives think of my religion, but this is something slightly different.
October 11, 201610 yr Author If you're not a Catholic, you might've missed this but it's something those familiar with the state of things picked up. When someone talks about "traditional Catholics", they mean something very specific. Sometimes referred to by other Catholics as "trads", it means people with strict adherence to social teaching, typically Latin Mass attendees, and those that are generally unhappy with the state of the Church since Vatican II. In fact, they refer to "trads" as a bastardization of the faith, which as a Latin mass attendee myself, I find mostly amusing. It's a fun headline to whip up the angry conservatives, but it's a re-writing of the exchange. Believe me, I have no illusions about what a lot of progressives think of my religion, but this is something slightly different. Nothing to see here then.....
October 11, 201610 yr Author As I said in another thread, the Left will excuse and condone and the media will say, "nothing to see here". If nothing else this just shows how corrupt things have become.
October 11, 201610 yr Nothing to see here then..... I'm just telling you that I've heard worse about traditional Catholicism from people who call themselves conservatives than what I just read in that e-mail.
October 11, 201610 yr I'm more concerned with where these emails are coming from and their authenticity. Poor Donald read a fake one at a rally that has already been debunked as Putin propaganda. Why are the Russians involved? Also nothing really earth shattering. I guess I'm desensitized after this past wkd :scared::puke:
October 11, 201610 yr Author I'm more concerned with where these emails are coming from and their authenticity. Poor Donald read a fake one at a rally that has already been debunked as Putin propaganda. Why are the Russians involved? Also nothing really earth shattering. I guess I'm desensitized after this past wkd :scared::puke: This is a unreal response. Dont matter what anyone has done, kill the people who exposed them. Merica.
October 12, 201610 yr Author Nothing in all these emails? We just move on I guess. Its ok to leak questions to Clintons campaign, by the new person who replaced the last crook at the DNC etc. Sheep.
October 12, 201610 yr More on contact with the DOJ: Clinton camp appeared to have contacts with DOJ on email case | TheHill This is the one that interests me. Hearing about a status conference is not unusual. The time and place of a status conference in federal court would be public record anyway and so not really earth-shattering. But if that's the case, then her lawyers would already know so who are they talking to at the DOJ and why? Now certainly we all have our sources; nobody worth a darn in that job wouldn't have somebody he could talk to inside. But the nature of that relationship holds some interest.
October 12, 201610 yr Author This is the one that interests me. Hearing about a status conference is not unusual. The time and place of a status conference in federal court would be public record anyway and so not really earth-shattering. But if that's the case, then her lawyers would already know so who are they talking to at the DOJ and why? Now certainly we all have our sources; nobody worth a darn in that job wouldn't have somebody he could talk to inside. But the nature of that relationship holds some interest. GetSlow all I am saying here is there is alot of smoke.........some that cannot be denied and nobody wants to talk about it.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.