January 21, 201610 yr Strong stuff today from the BGP Dyspepsia Society: -- Don't let Mrs. Clinton run for President because "what happens if ..."? -- A call for an FBI coup. -- Put Mrs. Clinton front and center on the "traitor list." -- Mrs. Clinton is a "felon" (even though to my knowledge she's never even been convicted of jaywalking). -- Prosecute the attorney general if he/she doesn't prosecute Mrs. Clinton. I thought Michigan was having the lead-in-the-water problem.
January 21, 201610 yr Author Strong stuff today from the BGP Dyspepsia Society: -- Don't let Mrs. Clinton run for President because "what happens if ..."? -- A call for an FBI coup. -- Put Mrs. Clinton front and center on the "traitor list." -- Mrs. Clinton is a "felon" (even though to my knowledge she's never even been convicted of jaywalking). -- Prosecute the attorney general if he/she doesn't prosecute Mrs. Clinton. I thought Michigan was having the lead-in-the-water problem. Par for the course ignore the actual topic.
January 21, 201610 yr I agree, the Attorney General and any other authority tasked with prosecuting such sensitive criminal matters that is failing to act should also be prosecuted. This utterly amazes me. Are you all truly amazed she isn't being prosecuted? I just can't believe anyone believe a single charge will be put forth against her. The Clinton are as close to as untouchable as exists.
January 21, 201610 yr Par for the course ignore the actual topic. The king of change the subject is back.
January 21, 201610 yr Par for the course ignore the actual topic. I'm confused. How can commenting on other comments be off topic? Nothing could be more "on-topic." I think what's disturbing to you and Bert is that someone is actually challenging this nonsense. Let's see ... we've had posters today advocating sedition, prosecution of a prosecutor unless the desired political outcome is achieved, and suspension of a candidacy based on a "what if." Just another day at the office.
January 21, 201610 yr https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071 ...and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.
January 21, 201610 yr I'm confused. How can commenting on other comments be off topic? Nothing could be more "on-topic." I think what's disturbing to you and Bert is that someone is actually challenging this nonsense. Let's see ... we've had posters today advocating sedition, prosecution of a prosecutor unless the desired political outcome is achieved, and suspension of a candidacy based on a "what if." Just another day at the office. You are correct. You condone ANYTHING HRC does. If she were a Republican or Independent you would be calling for a public hanging. I like any of the Republican candidates over her. If any of them was being investigated the way HRC is, I would be calling for them to step down from the race.
January 21, 201610 yr If she were a Republican or Independent you would be calling for a public hanging. I like any of the Republican candidates over her. If any of them was being investigated the way HRC is, I would be calling for them to step down from the race. No I wouldn't. Am I calling for Cruz to bow out because he was dishonest about reporting his million-dollar loan? I don't go crazy every time Breitbart or Fox posts a "new development." I'm content to let the investigators do their thing.
January 21, 201610 yr Chris Christie is still being investigated. Step down, sir. I agree, he needs to step down. Of course he's not being investigated for breaching National Security, just being a clown politician making a clown move.
January 21, 201610 yr No I wouldn't. Am I calling for Cruz to bow out because he was dishonest about reporting his million-dollar loan? I don't go crazy every time Breitbart or Fox posts a "new development." I'm content to let the investigators do their thing. If he was wins the primary, I'll bet you will be.
January 21, 201610 yr If he was wins the primary, I'll bet you will be. Looking at this from a political standpoint, why would the Dems want to remove a candidate from the ballot that Bob Dole says would be a liability at the polls?
January 21, 201610 yr Looking at this from a political standpoint, why would the Dems want to remove a candidate from the ballot that Bob Dole says would be a liability at the polls? Really? You are going to quote Bob Dole. You are grasping at anything.
January 21, 201610 yr No I wouldn't. Am I calling for Cruz to bow out because he was dishonest about reporting his million-dollar loan? I don't go crazy every time Breitbart or Fox posts a "new development." I'm content to let the investigators do their thing. Cruz isn't being investigated by the FBI for national security breaches now is he.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.