Bluegrasscard Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Former CBS investigative reporter who was subject of government hacking attacks on her files while at CBS. Wikipedia fans may not like the end. Very good watch. [video=youtube;-bYAQ-ZZtEU] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sports fan Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Very, very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBDV Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Can't watch currently, what is the short version? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doubledeuce Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Might get more interest in this thread if you didn't have AstroTurf in the title. Initially, I thought it had to do with a cover up off the negative effects of installing artificial turf......I learned something today! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaseballIsLife Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Very, very interesting. Thanks for posting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumper_Dad Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Hmmmmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumper_Dad Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 10minutes and 36 seconds well spent...thanks for sharing this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habib Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Might get more interest in this thread if you didn't have AstroTurf in the title. Initially, I thought it had to do with a cover up off the negative effects of installing artificial turf......I learned something today! I thought the same thing. :lol2: _______ At the surface-level what she said is already common sense for people who aren't eligible for a senior discount. But, I question what her takeaway was intended to be. It seemed like the insinuation was "ignore what you read and trust your gut" and not "ignore marketing and find quality sources instead." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theguru Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Hey everyone, I made an edit on the title but we need to get this one right. We are limited by characters on the title but if some of you want to refine it more let me know. Also, that was an EXCELLENT talk, one of the best TED talks ever and TED talks are some of the best time you will ever spend watching TV/presentations. One takeaway is Wikipedia is corrupt according to the speaker. Basically Wikipedia is driven by money and special interest and sponsorship. In other words Wikipedia, get ready because not too far down the line you are going to be involved in all types of litigation. The speaker said that in one study Wikipedia contradicted medical research 90% of the time. She said you should never trust what you read on Wikipedia. On a personal note, the speaker made an excellent point about wrongdoing. She said people attack the people that expose wrongdoing rather than the wrongdoers. Instead of questioning authority they question those that question the authority. I can 100% relate to that as the Independent Owner of BGP. Finally, everyone should watch this presentation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluegrasscard Posted August 22, 2015 Author Share Posted August 22, 2015 Thanks for making title more clear. 'Astroturfing' sort of came and went in the political circles some time back. As as this shows , it's far more than just politics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaseballIsLife Posted August 23, 2015 Share Posted August 23, 2015 Delete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumper_Dad Posted August 23, 2015 Share Posted August 23, 2015 She also mentions that Snopes has been duped. Some researchers say that Snopes isn't as pure as most believe and that slant responses based on personal beliefs of the founders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Schue Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 She also mentions that Snopes has been duped. Some researchers say that Snopes isn't as pure as most believe and that slant responses based on personal beliefs of the founders. Let me guess — this only happens when they attempt to debunk a conservative position's claims? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluegrasscard Posted August 24, 2015 Author Share Posted August 24, 2015 She also mentions that Snopes has been duped. Some researchers say that Snopes isn't as pure as most believe and that slant responses based on personal beliefs of the founders. Snopes is a joke of source for conversational. But even the White Houses uses Snopes as a source on certain things of controversy. Go figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumper_Dad Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Let me guess — this only happens when they attempt to debunk a conservative position's claims? Couldn't say, I was just looking into what she said about Snopes getting duped sometimes and found many others saying that Snopes isn't batting 1.000 on their claims. I didn't dig into it very far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts