February 18, 201412 yr Anyone else thinking that just maybe she went into the position with an agenda?
February 18, 201412 yr Of course. Put me with Clyde, I don't want to dismiss her claim, either the Bengals followed the law or not. However, if there is any gray area in this one I definitely side against any cheerleader in this case. We'll put you with Clyde, just put me with all the cheerleaders you can get together :sssh:
February 18, 201412 yr We'll put you with Clyde, just put me with all the cheerleaders you can get together :sssh: I would much rather be with Clyde.
February 18, 201412 yr We'll put you with Clyde, just put me with all the cheerleaders you can get together :sssh: I called Sarah Jones; she's on her way to your house now. :scared:
February 18, 201412 yr 2 former NFL cheerleaders are on the next season of Survivor. Would they even had been considered otherwise?
February 18, 201412 yr Tricky issue and it's similar to issue with interns right now at corporations. I would say without a doubt interns and these cheerleaders are employees . But I think anyone who would rock the boat on pay on these issues are doing more harm for themselves than good. Both positions are meant as a way to network and gain needed experience to put on your resume that money just can't buy. By trying to force employers to compensate better for these positions employers will just eliminate the job. I'm no legal expert. They seem like employees, but I also see the value they are receiving that goes beyond money and there needs to be an exception under the law if there already isn't.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.