Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Final Class 6A Rankings for 2013

Featured Replies

A can agree that their is an argument for other teams to be number one, but the above statement is purely speculative and can not be supported with fact.

 

In addition, Simon Kenton does not have to beat the tougher competition that Trinity has played.

 

In the pre-season St. Xavier was the team to beat, Trinity beat them, so Trinity is the team to beat, but Male beat them, so Male is the team to beat, then Manual beat them. Who is the team to beat now?

 

 

 

Pick one of the four. and you have a winner.

 

It is surely not SK.

Edited by Ram

  • Replies 61
  • Views 5.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It may be pure speculation, but give me one team off of Trinity's schedule that you think SK would beat? Not just Ram, anyone please answer.

Following this logic, Mason County and Bourbon County should be at the very top of 3A. The 3A poll has Mason 7th. They did their part on the field too.

 

I agree losing to a strong team does not always mean you are better, BUT the Louisville teams didn't just play better teams - they played teams eons better than those on the SK schedule.

 

JMO, but your #2 ranked Pioneers would be 0 - 10 if they played Trinity's schedule and maybe 2 -8 if they played St X's schedule.

 

What do you estimate Highlands record would be against Trinity or St.X's schedule?

It may be pure speculation' date=' but give me one team off of Trinity's schedule that you think SK would beat? Not just Ram, anyone please answer.[/quote']

 

How about this? What would you have speculated Trinity record against Trinity's schedule would have been at the start of the year?

What do you estimate Highlands record would be against Trinity or St.X's schedule?

 

By taking a quick look at each, I would say

 

St X's schedule - 7 - 3

Trinity's schedule - 3 - 6

How about this? What would you have speculated Trinity record against Trinity's schedule would have been at the start of the year?

 

Better than they wound up, but this is very hard to predict because I did not know the expectations of the teams from Tenn. and Ind.

 

I would have predicted losses to Colerain and Moeller, while expecting wins against all KY opponents.

By taking a quick look at each, I would say

 

St X's schedule - 7 - 3

Trinity's schedule - 3 - 6

 

This is interesting and simply one's opinion, but who would those losses and wins come against?

By taking a quick look at each, I would say

 

St X's schedule - 7 - 3

Trinity's schedule - 3 - 6

 

This is interesting and simply one's opinion, but who would those losses and wins come against?

 

 

ST X's wins + Male

 

Trinity's district games. So yes, a win over ST X. Sorry I'm a homer.

It may be pure speculation, but give me one team off of Trinity's schedule that you think SK would beat? Not just Ram, anyone please answer.

I don't think that can be answered, but you have to admit that if Simon Kenton and Trinity had switched schedules prior to the season, everyone would be saying Trinity was unstoppable and Simon Kenton was just another 6A team that did not have a chance. So, given the information we have, why not say the same with roles reversed?

What do you estimate Highlands record would be against Trinity or St.X's schedule?

 

Thread topic is 6A. Highlands is 4A.

ST X's wins + Male

 

Trinity's district games. So yes, a win over ST X. Sorry I'm a homer.

 

No need to apologize.

I don't think that can be answered, but you have to admit that if Simon Kenton and Trinity had switched schedules prior to the season, everyone would be saying Trinity was unstoppable and Simon Kenton was just another 6A team that did not have a chance. So, given the information we have, why not say the same with roles reversed?

 

With schedules and roles reversed Trinity would be 10 - 0 with at least 8 running clock games. SK would be 0 - 10 with plenty of those games being running clocks against them.

 

Play the game with me, who could SK beat on Trinity's schedule. It's just an opinion on an opinion board.

I have to agree with Ram, just because you play a tough schedule doesnt always mean you the best team.

I have to agree with Ram, just because you play a tough schedule doesnt always mean you the best team.

 

I'll concede that if you guys will also concede that simply going 10 - 0 against a pitiful schedule doesn't mean your the best team either.

Play the game with me, who could SK beat on Trinity's schedule. It's just an opinion on an opinion board.

I think if the schedule was reversed, the results would be the same for both teams. That is why we have this discussions. But, again if the schedule and results were exactly reversed, people would be saying how powerful Trinity was and how bad Simon Kenton was.

 

I think Trinity won the games they should have, but lost the games versus the great competition. I think they would have gotten the benefit of the doubt if they would have won a game or two that people didn't expect them to.

 

I am far from a Trinity hater, in fact, I venture a guess that I am the only person in NEKY that has a Trinity sweatshirt. I just wish they would have gotten that signature win.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.