I wonder if these Sherriff's employ investigative or analytical assistance from the FBI, and plan on continuing to do so? Had a school shooting in your county? Don't count on Federal support!!! Oh, and that federal funding you were counting on for school resource officers just had to be diverted!

 

Yet thankfully the first people that these local sheriffs answer to are the local people voting them into office. BTW, none of those things will be diverted. If they uphold what they have said, you simply won't see any cases in their counties where they have made arrest concerning new gun control laws. Of course, I really don't believe anything is going to get out of Congress nationally, and I know for a fact that our state is not going to pass increased legislation.

I wonder if these Sherriff's employ investigative or analytical assistance from the FBI, and plan on continuing to do so? Had a school shooting in your county? Don't count on Federal support!!! Oh, and that federal funding you were counting on for school resource officers just had to be diverted!

 

So your answer to the Sheriff defending the constitution is for the Federal government to hold the citizens of United States money over their head? I don't know if there is anything more dirty in politics than the Federal government black mailing their own citizens with money that isn't theirs to begin with.

So your answer to the Sheriff defending the constitution is for the Federal government to hold the citizens of United States money over their head? I don't know if there is anything more dirty in politics than the Federal government black mailing their own citizens with money that isn't theirs to begin with.

Agreed.

These guys go out of their way to sound like Charleston in 1860. The good news is that it won't take 600,000 deaths to show them how wrong they are. If Congress passes a law and the SC upholds it, they will fold like pup tents in a hurricane.

 

Unless I'm mistaken, state and local law enforcement officers are not required to enforce federal laws; even federal laws upheld by the SC.

Unless I'm mistaken, state and local law enforcement officers are not required to enforce federal laws; even federal laws upheld by the SC.

 

I was wondering if someone was going to bring this up. Not to mention that EO's only apply to employee's of the Executive branch.

Police officers in Colorado and Washington aren't enforcing Federal Marijuana laws. I don't see this being any different.

Don't forget Obama has continued Bush's.

 

That's what you want people to believe because he's done what GB couldn't do

That's what you want people to believe because he's done what GB couldn't do[/quote

 

By this do you mean increase our Naitonal Debt at an even faster rate and fail at historical levels at fixing the economy with CBO now reporting Unemployment won't drop below 7.5% until atleast 2014.

Unless I'm mistaken, state and local law enforcement officers are not required to enforce federal laws; even federal laws upheld by the SC.

 

That may well be true. I think it is more evidence that this guy is trying to sound like 1860. If he knows he'll never have to deliver, so much the better for him. If he was ever in a position where he had to either do his job or defy the federal government, he'd fold. I know nothing about this guy other than this statement. He sounds like an puffed up chest blowhard.

That may well be true. I think it is more evidence that this guy is trying to sound like 1860. If he knows he'll never have to deliver, so much the better for him. If he was ever in a position where he had to either do his job or defy the federal government, he'd fold. I know nothing about this guy other than this statement. He sounds like an puffed up chest blowhard.

 

So in your own statement you admit to not knowing the sheriff , but then go on to say he is a blowhard. Glad to see we are making assumptions based in fact.

I believe he was stating his opinion. It's not his fault that he nailed it! :ylsuper:

I believe he was stating his opinion. It's not his fault that he nailed it! :ylsuper:

 

I'll store that in the memory bank, so a suitable description of someone who decides to speak up for a constitutional right is a blow hard. Until he doesn't follow through on his statements I'll have accept the man at his word because I have no reason not to call me old fashioned.

Not sure if you can tell or not, but I have no use for Jeff Kidwell in either his role as the head of the CCRP or as CC Sheriff.

Sincerely, a Campbell County Republican

That's what you want people to believe because he's done what GB couldn't do

:lol: He's continued things people like you torched Bush for, but now it's ok.... Patriot Act ring a bell? He's worse on the debt and unemployment...well...

I'll store that in the memory bank, so a suitable description of someone who decides to speak up for a constitutional right is a blow hard. Until he doesn't follow through on his statements I'll have accept the man at his word because I have no reason not to call me old fashioned.

 

He isn't speaking up for a constitutional right. He is speaking up for his version of a constitutional right rather than relying on the people that under our constitution have the duty to interpret what the constitution says. He is popping off like an 1860 confederate. how'd that work out.