So it couldn't be that perhaps they go deeper in their rosters with very talented players, as opposed to simply having all the "best players" at the top of their rosters? Couldn't have anything to do with the level of coaching at these schools? Or the fact that they are both simply great, well-run, established programs/systems? They no doubt have some very, very good players, but to claim they should have a dozen spots on the all-state team is ludicrious.