RCC9

I asked you to bullet out all your questions. I will answer them one by one and then we can put this to bed. You may have not been here, but the answers are all there if you were really just interested in getting answers. you keep saying no one has answered you. Yes we have, numerous times. Just look them up and you can get the answer to every one of your questions. OR...you can bullet them out one by one and I will answer them all...again.

I have no idea if orbhow much limiting enrollment hurt them. I can show you years where out of district kids had a huge impact on their success and I can show you years where they had very little impact on the success. And if you want to know, these last two years, we had out of district kids on the team.

You bullet out the exact questions you want answered and I'll answer everyone of them. (Even though they have all been answered in detail on BGP already)

I'll answer anything you want. I've done it 1000 times on here. You can go back and look at any thread and you'll get the answer to every question you've already asked. They are out there. Every one of them and I've answered them 100 times. As for enrollment, they really only locked it down complete for about two years. And even in those years, there were limited spots in certain classes in the grade schools based on the size of the classes. So if want to think those couple years of lock down is what contibuted to this, then have at it. But you are mid informed. Especially when we told this forum that traditionally it's been about 5% of the makeup of the varsity squad over the years. So do your Cov Cath math and tell me how many players is that per year when you carry about 100 each year?

See...people do answer your questions but you don't believe them. So this will never end because when we do answer...you basically say "that's not it, here's what's wrong!" So why ask the questions if you know all the answers or aren't going to listen to the answers you are asking for? It's just a little hate game for you and what it actually is doing is proving the legitimacy and relevance of the program. If they aren't relevant anymore in your opinion, why all the posts about them???? Lol!! Let's discuss a team that has relevancy! We know why you want to talk about them!

You ask questions and then answer them with your own opinion. That's funny!! That's not looking for answers. That's spewing your hate and not even listening to the answers you are getting! You are using this entire thread just to hate and every poster sees right through you my man. Lol! No different than several others on here!!!

You are absolutely clueless! You really think the decision to close and then re-open enrollment had ANYTHING to do with football??? Whether you want to believe this or not, education decisions are first and foremost at the school. PERIOD! There are times of reasons why they shut it down for a couple years and tons for why they opened it back up. And none of those reasons have anything to do with football!!!lol!! That's hilarious!! And if you knew what you were talking about, you'd know that they aren't completely open. It's a numbers game in each class and there is stringent criteria on who gets priority based on acedemic performance and attendance records, etc. so no, they aren't completely open and the criteria on whether you get in has nothing to do with whether you play football. So again, keep reaching and ASSUMING you know what your talking about. What's funny is you are kinda looking like the democrats. You keep spewing this stuff and I see many posters coming from outside HHS to defend...because they know your rhetoric is plain silly! But keep spreading the hate! We are used to it! You'll go away like all the others have in the past.

Why do you keep saying "and you think there's nothing wrong?" I don't think there is one poster that has said "there is nothing wrong". You're fighting a battle with what you think people are saying...not with what they are actually saying. I don't live Year by year. You can have up years and down years. Some down years are worse than other down years. But at the end of the day, it's just a down year. To me if you don't win state, you lost just like everyone else. When you lost and how bad you lost is irrelevant. You still lost! So you can try to act like because they had maybe the worse record in HHS history that it's more significant than other down years, but someone that's been around for awhile, it's just a down year. I don't care "how " down they were. And yes, in the 100 years we've been playing football, we've had plenty of down years. And guess what, we'll have them again! And all the haters will come back and tell us again we are done and irrelevant! And the cycle will start all over again...just like it does every other time we've been down. I agree this coming year will still be a challenge. But then you will see them start creeping again.

This would need a whole other thread to discuss. It's not just the number of kids that are playing in college in one class compared to the others. There are a whole lot of other factors to that discussion if we are trying to use the number of kids playing in college to justify that the talent levels were similar on each of those last two teams compared to the previous 8 years. .

So you are here to hate??? hahahahahahhahah It's two years. Down years happen from time to time (regardless how down they are and what their record was)...it happens. History tells us they will be back. You can continue to look at it thru a microscope that only includes the last two year, but for someone that's been around for a long time, we've seen this before and they always recover. Heck you say the dominance started 25 years ago. So lets go back to then. Did people back then have any idea they were going to go on a 25 year dominate run or did they just think they were decent? My point, they had no clue what HHS was going to do and they were average at the time and they turned it back around. Again, i'll go with history and history tells me they will be just fine. If BGP was around back then, I'm sure we would have been having the same discussion (has HHS come back to the pack). And fast forward to present day and we are talking about 25 years of dominance. You're reaching!

Miami, ND, Florida...all dominated for an Era.

Who? And once you give me that answer, tell me how those numbers compare to the teams in the past.

Sensitive? What are you talking about?? You said what about SH? I'm asking...what about them? What did you want to say about them?? I'm not even a SK fan.

As much as I like the Camels, I think Mason is too much for them this year.

What about them?

SK is pretty darn good! It's tough to hang with them for an entire game if you can't match the horses.

Guess they put all their players back in.

Thanks for the updates!

SK must be holding kids out for the "defining" tournament right?

I think Holmes will get this one.

I agree on Cheatum! I think I said that last year!! Like her game.

What do you think I could get for them on Craigslist??

Program defining? Multiple State tournament runs is program defining. Doing well in a stacked mid-season tournament for one year would be considered a good tournament and a nice run. Not really "program defining". It's tough to "define" a program in high school because you are dealt a different hand every year. You deal with what you get, unless you go after players, which is against the rules. And didn't the staff create the schedule? Why would they hold out now if they scheduled it this way???

Sorry! Above was supposed to say congrats! Not congress!

Is there video? And why did HC bench get a technical? And for those that were there, why was it perceived as intentional by the refs? Was it intentional? And if so why? Did something happen to provoke the intention?