Anyone else see the irony in a Fox News journalist 'mistreating' a Tea Party member and an MSNBC journalist insulting Obama?

So.... the Fox News journalist 'mistreated' a Tea Party member but Obama was insulted? Am I reading that right? :lol:

That may be, but it doesn't change the fact that it's poor journalism to do it in that fashion...period. Like I said, a good journalist knows it was wrong to word it that way. Rockmom was correct earlier on in the thread that he could have said it in a more professional way. If you disagree with that, than I have to believe your judgement is definitely clouded.

You already believe that, evidently ...

 

Actually, it merely means I have a different view of things. Just because I disagree with your view doesn't mean my judgment is faulty.

Two people agreed with me in one thread?! :eek:

 

Watch out world! We're spinning out of control! :lol:

You should make more trips to NKY, it's done wonders for you. :lol:

You already believe that, evidently ...

 

Actually, it merely means I have a different view of things. Just because I disagree with your view doesn't mean my judgment is faulty.

Now, if you could only realize that works both ways...:lol:

To summarize:

 

We do not believe that Wallace was insulting her nor does he think she truly is a flake.

It could have been asked better.

He was trying to give her the chance to respond to critics.

No ill intentions. No "gotcha" Sarah Palin questions.

 

Yet we're still upset.

Gotta tell ya, I haven't seen anyone upset in this thread yet.

Gotta tell ya, I haven't seen anyone upset in this thread yet.

 

Semantics.

Semantics.

 

If it makes it easier to digest my point insert "bothered" for "upset." Point remains the same.

Now, if you could only realize that works both ways...:lol:

I don't maintain you're always wrong, RTS ... I simply point out that you're hardly objective and unbiased.

Examples?

 

 

 

Hannity anytime he has a liberal guest as well as when it used to be Hannity and Colmes. I don't know why he ever had Colmes. He never let Colmes talk and when Hannity talked he had such a condescending tone when addressing Colmes.

 

Bill O'Reilly when he had Ludacris on his show after O'Reilly badmouthed Pepsi for having Ludacris as a sponsor. He talked about Pepsi everyday until they dropped Ludacris and when he had Ludacris on his show he never let Ludacris say one word to defend himself.

 

Anytime Fox News gives Ann Coulter the microphone.

 

 

 

I'll search from some YouTube videos when I get some time at home.

 

Those are just some examples albeit broad examples. I'll provide video links when I get time.

So.... the Fox News journalist 'mistreated' a Tea Party member but Obama was insulted? Am I reading that right? :lol:

 

 

Yes. Wallace asked her if she was a flake. The guy from MSNBC called Obama an obscenity. Two different things isn't it? Especially when Wallace's was in an interview and the MSNBC guy just blurted it out. Am I missing something here?

Hannity anytime he has a liberal guest as well as when it used to be Hannity and Colmes. I don't know why he ever had Colmes. He never let Colmes talk and when Hannity talked he had such a condescending tone when addressing Colmes.

 

Bill O'Reilly when he had Ludacris on his show after O'Reilly badmouthed Pepsi for having Ludacris as a sponsor. He talked about Pepsi everyday until they dropped Ludacris and when he had Ludacris on his show he never let Ludacris say one word to defend himself.

 

Anytime Fox News gives Ann Coulter the microphone.

 

 

 

I'll search from some YouTube videos when I get some time at home.

 

Those are just some examples albeit broad examples. I'll provide video links when I get time.

But, where's the name calling?

Yes. Wallace asked her if she was a flake. The guy from MSNBC called Obama an obscenity. Two different things isn't it? Especially when Wallace's was in an interview and the MSNBC guy just blurted it out. Am I missing something here?

Yes, Wallace insulted her directly in an interview. The MSNBC guy didn't say it to Obama and he thought he was on the delay so as to be bleeps, as I heard it.

I don't maintain you're always wrong, RTS ... I simply point out that you're hardly objective and unbiased.

Which is what I, and several others, do with you.

If it makes it easier to digest my point insert "bothered" for "upset." Point remains the same.

Not really, two different meanings entirely, but ok, I get your point.