March 5, 201016 yr Its a steal, I agree, but we would be paying him quite a bit of money if we made the trade and thus it makes me a bit worried since his durability has been in doubt these past couple seasons. I'm not against the Bengals acquiring Boldin, as I'd be very happy if they did! All I'm trying to say is if the opportunity is there to grab Terrell Owens, I'd do it because he has been consistent and his durability isn't in question. Bascially I want results with the money that is going to be paid to one of these guys and I'd just feel a bit more comfortable about it if it were Owens instead of Boldin. I understand what you are saying but I'm a Cowboy fan more than a Bengal fan. So I'll pass on a T.O. over a Boldin.
March 5, 201016 yr Its a steal, I agree, but we would be paying him quite a bit of money if we made the trade and thus it makes me a bit worried since his durability has been in doubt these past couple seasons. I'm not against the Bengals acquiring Boldin, as I'd be very happy if they did! All I'm trying to say is if the opportunity is there to grab Terrell Owens, I'd do it because he has been consistent and his durability isn't in question. Bascially I want results with the money that is going to be paid to one of these guys and I'd just feel a bit more comfortable about it if it were Owens instead of Boldin. C'mon man T.O is going on 37 and has dropped off significantly. He'd be cheaper than Boldin, but you get what you pay for.
March 5, 201016 yr Author Boldin would without a doubt be a better pickup, IMO. But I still wouldn't mind grabbing T.O.
March 5, 201016 yr C'mon man T.O is going on 37 and has dropped off significantly. He'd be cheaper than Boldin, but you get what you pay for. TO would be better than any other receiver we have right now besides Chad. Boldin would be better to get than TO, and Marshall would be the best to get out of all of them. The Bengals realistically could get any one of those three guys if they really wanted to IMO. However we know how the Bengals are, so I will be happy as long as they make sure they get one of them. I really wish they would just get Marshall though. He is still rather young, and already a proven talent. Who cares if you have to give up that 1st round pick for him. You would be having to give a 1st round pick a big contract, so might as well give that big contract to someone who is proven.
March 5, 201016 yr TO would be better than any other receiver we have right now besides Chad. Boldin would be better to get than TO, and Marshall would be the best to get out of all of them. The Bengals realistically could get any one of those three guys if they really wanted to IMO. However we know how the Bengals are, so I will be happy as long as they make sure they get one of them. I really wish they would just get Marshall though. He is still rather young, and already a proven talent. Who cares if you have to give up that 1st round pick for him. You would be having to give a 1st round pick a big contract, so might as well give that big contract to someone who is proven. Do you consider giving up a 1st round pick for Marshall as better than only giving up a 3rd rounder for Boldin? Marshall is the better player IMO, but I think I'd be tempted to keep my 1st rounder and get Boldin and pick up a TE in the draft because I don't think Coffman is going to get the job done.
March 5, 201016 yr Author Reports for Boldin are Pats vs Ravens. Please do not go to the Ravens...please.
March 5, 201016 yr Do you consider giving up a 1st round pick for Marshall as better than only giving up a 3rd rounder for Boldin? Marshall is the better player IMO, but I think I'd be tempted to keep my 1st rounder and get Boldin and pick up a TE in the draft because I don't think Coffman is going to get the job done. Yes. Marshall is younger I believe, and not as injury prone as Boldin. There is no guarntees that they guy they take in the first round will pan out anyways, especially the TEs. So I would rather them have a guy who is one of the top 5 receivers in the NFL IMO. A guy who could be their number 1 for years to come still. With that said, I would not be sad at all if they get Boldin. If I had the choice, I would rather them give up that 1st for Marshall though.
March 6, 201016 yr If the Bengals could get him for a third round pick, then they should definitely try. Don't the Bengals have two third round picks this year? If so it just makes to much sense. Someone might offer a better third round pick, but the Bengals should at least try if this is true. I still would rather give up a 1st round pick for Marshall though. Marshall not only helps for this year, but for long term. However getting Boldin would still be awesome, especially for just a third rounder! How many Draft Picks does the Bengals have? I have been looking for it but I can't find it.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.