February 6, 201016 yr Colts? Reggie Wayne and who? Look up Dallas Clark's stats. He might be listed as a TE but he's as good as just about any receiver in the game.
February 6, 201016 yr I think if the list includes both WR and TE then there are alot of better combos. He said 1-2 punch so that's how I took it. I'm with you. I'd rather have Crabtree/Davis too. It's good to see the Bengals at least care and are looking. If I'm going to roll the dice of the franchise on a headcase I'm going to get Marshall though. Honestly if I'm going to spend money then I'd swap Chad and a pick then spend the money on Boldin + Marshall. That duo is WAY better than Johnson/Owens!
February 6, 201016 yr No team outside of Arizona and New England would be able to boast a 1-2 punch as good. Really? You don't think NO has that type of punch? Or Indy, how about Green Bay, all have been more productive than those two in the past couple of years.
February 6, 201016 yr He said 1-2 punch so that's how I took it. I'm with you. I'd rather have Crabtree/Davis too. It's good to see the Bengals at least care and are looking. If I'm going to roll the dice of the franchise on a headcase I'm going to get Marshall though. Honestly if I'm going to spend money then I'd swap Chad and a pick then spend the money on Boldin + Marshall. That duo is WAY better than Johnson/Owens! Really? You don't think NO has that type of punch? Or Indy, how about Green Bay, all have been more productive than those two in the past couple of years. :thumb::thumb: 2 thumbs up gentlemen. I agree.
February 6, 201016 yr Really? You don't think NO has that type of punch? Or Indy, how about Green Bay, all have been more productive than those two in the past couple of years. I'd take a lot of teams combo of WR's Chad and TO.
February 6, 201016 yr I'd take a lot of teams combo of WR's Chad and TO. I agree. However put Chad with Brandon Marshall, and I think they definitely would be in the top 5 when it comes to best duo's at receiver.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.