This just further shows that Obama is a radical communist.

 

Don't forget Marxist and socialist.

Don't forget Marxist and socialist.

 

Apparently advocating government control of one sixth of the economy is not sufficient to label one a socialist. It must even fall so short of being sufficient that it warrants mocking those who venture to make such a claim. It therefore begs the question: how much of the economy must one wish to be under government control before one can accurately be deemed to be a socialist?

Apparently advocating government control of one sixth of the economy is not sufficient to label one a socialist. It must even fall so short of being sufficient that it warrants mocking those who venture to make such a claim. It therefore begs the question: how much of the economy must one wish to be under government control before one can accurately be deemed to be a socialist?

 

First, my response was to the absurd comment about the POTUS being a "radical communist." Do you agree with the poster?

 

Secondly, please define exactly what the meaning of "government control of 1/6 of the economy" means in this argument and what exactly the ramifications would be as you see it.

 

Unless the govt becomes the sole provider of health insurance I don't buy that description.

I guess this is what Bush meant when he talked about his "mandate":

And you're just looking for reasons to complain about Obama. This is as ridiculous as those that faulted Bush for holding hands with the Saudis.

 

I agree. Looking for nothing and finding something. As far as an apologist...he's a politician. If it plays into the favor of other leaders, then great. I don't care about what he says, I care about his actions.

I agree. Looking for nothing and finding something. As far as an apologist...he's a politician. If it plays into the favor of other leaders, then great. I don't care about what he says, I care about his actions.

Looking silly when you're representing this great country doesn't bode well for any president (see post #64) and Obama looked silly.

Looking silly when you're representing this great country doesn't bode well for any president (see post #64) and Obama looked silly.

 

You're being overly critical on this point. I didn't care when Bush slipped up in a few of his speeches by stuttering or mispronouncing words and I don't care how Obama bows.

You're being overly critical on this point. I didn't care when Bush slipped up in a few of his speeches by stuttering or mispronouncing words and I don't care how Obama bows.

That's great, but there are many, many many that feel different. And just in case you didn't know, Obama isn't the only U.S. president to be frowned upon for looking stupid by bowing. However, he did look the silliest.

That's great, but there are many, many many that feel different. And just in case you didn't know, Obama isn't the only U.S. president to be frowned upon for looking stupid by bowing. However, he did look the silliest.

 

 

Why did he look the silliest? Is that a broad consensus, or your own conclusion?

Why did he look the silliest? Is that a broad consensus, or your own conclusion?

He's the only one that that bowed so deep he could have tied his shoe laces. :sssh: Ask Kyodo News why they didn't want to publish the photo , seems it's their consensus as well.

He's the only one that that bowed so deep he could have tied his shoe laces. :sssh: Ask Kyodo News why they didn't want to publish the photo , seems it's their consensus as well.

 

Or that it's not that big of a story (or deal) for them. :sssh:

Or that it's not that big of a story (or deal) for them. :sssh:

Doubt that, the opted to go with the picture of him shaking hands instead. :sssh:

He's the only one that that bowed so deep he could have tied his shoe laces. :sssh: Ask Kyodo News why they didn't want to publish the photo , seems it's their consensus as well.

 

 

So, nothing has been stated by anyone in the media, foreign or domestic that says Obama looked silly. It's your perception, therefore anything less than an all out statement by all media that Obama did not look silly would not satisfy you?

 

Basically, you've made a perception on your own, and assigned agreement to pretty much everyone else in the world based on the fact that no one reported specifically that Obama did not look silly.

Doubt that, the opted to go with the picture of him shaking hands instead. :sssh:

 

Do you have anything to validate your theory?

He may have been looking for a lost contact lens.

 

I saw the picture and the first thing that went through my head was:

 

"Thank you sir,may I have another."