August 14, 200917 yr Picked it up tonight after I went to the gym and I'm not very impressed with the game play. The graphics are great, but the game-play isn't very good IMO...I'd rather play NCAA 10. Anyone else picked it up yet?
August 14, 200917 yr Madden's game play has been TERRIBLE for the past few years. I've decided to pass for now.
August 14, 200917 yr Author Madden's game play has been TERRIBLE for the past few years. I've decided to pass for now. It's a good decision IMO.
August 14, 200917 yr The game play is SLOWWWWWWW. Not good at all, IMO. I just read a review, and apparently you can change game speed and Slow is the default.
August 14, 200917 yr You need to change the game speed from slow to very fast. Personally I think it is the best madden in the past couple years. I enjoyed it.
August 14, 200917 yr I read that you can really tell the difference between ratings. Apparently Qbs with low ratings are not very accurate in 2010.
August 14, 200917 yr The game play is SLOWWWWWWW. Not good at all, IMO. It was too fast in years past.
August 14, 200917 yr Author You need to change the game speed from slow to very fast. Personally I think it is the best madden in the past couple years. I enjoyed it. That would explain it. I wonder if EA will come out with a roster update that will include Vick, it'd be intersting to see what he is rated. I think some of the player ratings are really low, Chris Johnson is better than an 88 IMO, and I know he's garbage, but Tavaris Jackson is better than a 67, not much better, but he's not a 67.
August 14, 200917 yr That would explain it. I wonder if EA will come out with a roster update that will include Vick, it'd be intersting to see what he is rated. I think some of the player ratings are really low, Chris Johnson is better than an 88 IMO, and I know he's garbage, but Tavaris Jackson is better than a 67, not much better, but he's not a 67. I like Johnson around 88, but agreed that 67 seems incredibly low for Jackson...
August 14, 200917 yr That would explain it. I wonder if EA will come out with a roster update that will include Vick, it'd be intersting to see what he is rated. I think some of the player ratings are really low, Chris Johnson is better than an 88 IMO, and I know he's garbage, but Tavaris Jackson is better than a 67, not much better, but he's not a 67. The guys at EA lowered ratings almost across the board this year. They graded tougher, so the ratings are generally lower than years past. I thought it was a good move.
August 14, 200917 yr I like Johnson around 88, but agreed that 67 seems incredibly low for Jackson... As long as his speed is 99...
August 14, 200917 yr Author As long as his speed is 99... It is a 99. But I think he's better than an 88, I'd have him at a 91 or so. Here are the Top 5 player ratings at each position: Quarterbacks Peyton Manning-99 Tom Brady-98 Drew Brees-97 Kurt Warner-94 Ben Roethlisberger-93 Running Backs Adrian Peterson-97 Michael Turner-95 LaDanian Tomlinson-94 Brian Westbrook-94 DeAngelo Williams-94 Wide Receivers Larry Fitzgerald-99 Andre Johnson-98 Steve Smith-97 Randy Moss-96 Reggie Wayne-95 Tight Ends Tony Gonzalez-98 Jason Witten-97 Antonio Gates-95 Chris Cooley-91 Dallas Clark-91 Defense Nnamdi Asomghu-99 Albert Haynesworth-99 Ed Reed-99 Troy Polamalu-99 Patrick Willis-98
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.