June 15, 200917 yr I'd go with Redick, Sasha, Luke but you are right in your assessment and that is my whole point. There is no huge drop off from one to the next so I'll roll with the Dukie all day every day. There you go.:thumb: But like I say one man's garbage is well, another man's garbage.
June 15, 200917 yr I think Luke peaked 3 years ago and we are on the downside of his career. He is getting worse with every breath we take.
June 15, 200917 yr How is Sasha better? JJ had a much better Finals and overall playoffs than Sasha did, for that matter. Did Sasha even play in the Finals? Luke's advantage over JJ is that he is taller and fatter so he can get a rebound or two more than JJ, but seriously, what else does Luke do. He can't shoot, he's scared to shoot, he misses free throws, and if his last name wasn't Walton, he'd already be out of the league. You can't tell me that the Lakers couldn't use a guy who the defense wouldn't pay attention to that can actually hit a wide open 3. JJ couldn't even see the floor when the Magic were pretty bad...How do you think he'd fare better on the Lakers? Walton has a bigger frame, and is better defensively than JJ.
June 15, 200917 yr There you go.:thumb: But like I say one man's garbage is well, another man's garbage. :lol: That's good, I like that one.:lol:
June 15, 200917 yr JJ couldn't even see the floor when the Magic were pretty bad...How do you think he'd fare better on the Lakers? Walton has a bigger frame, and is better defensively than JJ. That's debatable, they are both awful on defense. Keep in mind that Luke has to guard the Carmelos, Vince Carters, and LeBron's of the world. JJ has to guard Kobes, Ray Allens, and Ben Gordons. I feel sorry for both of them when they hit the court in all reality.
June 15, 200917 yr JJ couldn't even see the floor when the Magic were pretty bad...How do you think he'd fare better on the Lakers? Walton has a bigger frame, and is better defensively than JJ. Plus, when JJ hit the court I don't remember him hurting the Magic by being out there. Luke was awful and 1 turnover or missed shot and then he was playing with less confidence. He turned and looked away from the goal on so many open looks that it was akin to playing 4-on-5 when he was out there because he wasn't going to shoot no matter what. Then, he'd turn it over. At least JJ would shoot and if he missed, Howard likely got the rebound. He also was a good reason the Magic won their close out game against the 76ers' when Howard was suspended. How many playoff victories did Luke and Sasha help the Lakers get?
June 15, 200917 yr How is Sasha better? JJ had a much better Finals and overall playoffs than Sasha did, for that matter. Did Sasha even play in the Finals? Luke's advantage over JJ is that he is taller and fatter so he can get a rebound or two more than JJ, but seriously, what else does Luke do. He can't shoot, he's scared to shoot, he misses free throws, and if his last name wasn't Walton, he'd already be out of the league. You can't tell me that the Lakers couldn't use a guy who the defense wouldn't pay attention to that can actually hit a wide open 3. Redick shot .391 from long range this season. Vujacic shot .387. Sasha is three inches taller. He's more athletic. He's a better defender. The have no need for JJ. They have enough guys who can hit open threes...and the guys they have that can do that bring a lot more to the table...like rebounding, defense and passing. JJ brings nothing. If all you can do is shoot...you better bring more than 39 percent.
June 15, 200917 yr Redick shot .391 from long range this season. Vujacic shot .387. Sasha is three inches taller. He's more athletic. He's a better defender. The have no need for JJ. They have enough guys who can hit open threes...and the guys they have that can do that bring a lot more to the table...like rebounding, defense and passing. JJ brings nothing. If all you can do is shoot...you better bring more than 39 percent. :thumb: I would take Sasha over JJ as well. Better defense and better in the open court.
June 15, 200917 yr Here I will settle this unbiasedly. JJ Reddick is a garbage NBA player. Luke Walton is a garbage NBA player. Vujacic is a garbage NBA player. Of the 3, I will take Sasha, Walton, Redick in that order, but it's not like there is a big difference. There's a huge difference. Two of those guys give you more. Rebounding, defense, passing....things that allow you to put them on the court without holding your breath. One of them is a shooter that hits about 40 percent of his threes. If that's all he can give you, he isn't worth bringing off the bench. My goodness, where on earth has this JJ Redick-mania come from. He was a great college player and that's where it ended.
June 15, 200917 yr :thumb: I would take Sasha over JJ as well. Better defense and better in the open court. Not to mention Sasha can shoot. He was just in slump late in the season. It happens.
June 15, 200917 yr Plus, when JJ hit the court I don't remember him hurting the Magic by being out there. Luke was awful and 1 turnover or missed shot and then he was playing with less confidence. He turned and looked away from the goal on so many open looks that it was akin to playing 4-on-5 when he was out there because he wasn't going to shoot no matter what. Then, he'd turn it over. At least JJ would shoot and if he missed, Howard likely got the rebound. He also was a good reason the Magic won their close out game against the 76ers' when Howard was suspended. How many playoff victories did Luke and Sasha help the Lakers get? So I like the comparisons you give of Luke and JJ. Apparently JJ can do no wrong and has never committed a turnover in the NBA while Luke has committed a turnover every time he has touched the ball....
June 15, 200917 yr There's a huge difference. Two of those guys give you more. Rebounding, defense, passing....things that allow you to put them on the court without holding your breath. One of them is a shooter that hits about 40 percent of his threes. If that's all he can give you, he isn't worth bringing off the bench. My goodness, where on earth has this JJ Redick-mania come from. He was a great college player and that's where it ended. All 3 are bench guys. Most teams in the league have a Luke Walton or JJ Redick off the bench. Sure Sasha and Walton give you more, but what is the difference. As a Laker fan would you be worried if they Lakers traded Sasha or Walton? Probably not. You would be getting a different scrub with a different skill set most likely. The NBA, a scrub is a scrub.
June 15, 200917 yr All 3 are bench guys. Most teams in the league have a Luke Walton or JJ Redick off the bench. Sure Sasha and Walton give you more, but what is the difference. As a Laker fan would you be worried if they Lakers traded Sasha or Walton? Probably not. You would be getting a different scrub with a different skill set most likely. The NBA, a scrub is a scrub. These guys are role players. They help your team. The more things they can do adequately, the less of a liability they are. Just because they're not All-Stars doesn't mean they don't contribute to the team. You can't win without a bench and Walton and Sasha help LA's bench more than Redick would or could. It's not likely they'd make the difference in whether you won a title or not, but I don't like to see my team downgraded anywhere if they can keep from it. Besides, LA already has Adam Morrison. They certainly don't need another one-dimensional bust on the roster. Although, JJ sitting next to Morrison in a suit on the end of the bench might be a good story. They could relive their glory days while watching the real Lakers team roll off wins.
June 15, 200917 yr These guys are role players. They help your team. The more things they can do adequately, the less of a liability they are. Just because they're not All-Stars doesn't mean they don't contribute to the team. You can't win without a bench and Walton and Sasha help LA's bench more than Redick would or could. It's not likely they'd make the difference in whether you won a title or not, but I don't like to see my team downgraded anywhere if they can keep from it. Besides, LA already has Adam Morrison. They certainly don't need another one-dimensional bust on the roster. Although, JJ sitting next to Morrison in a suit on the end of the bench might be a good story. They could relive their glory days while watching the real Lakers team roll off wins. Role players = replaceable. It's not like Sasha or Walton are unique, or even exceptional at their roles. Like I said, all 3 are garbage.
June 15, 200917 yr All 3 are bench guys. Most teams in the league have a Luke Walton or JJ Redick off the bench. Sure Sasha and Walton give you more, but what is the difference. As a Laker fan would you be worried if they Lakers traded Sasha or Walton? Probably not. You would be getting a different scrub with a different skill set most likely. The NBA, a scrub is a scrub. That is the difference... they give you more.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.