February 26, 200917 yr But that's like saying that all Christians are perfect, and anyone else who is not a Christian is not. It's very disrespectful IMO no matter how you spin it. Actually, no it isn't. That's the problem with cutting and pasting a short excerpt from any conversation. And, applying the wrong definition to a word... The word "perfect" has several definitions, but two specifically apply to this discussion. 1. Lacking nothing essential to the whole; complete of its nature or kind. 2. Being without defect or blemish: a perfect specimen. The Bible tells us that Jesus is the "founder and perfecter of our faith" (Hebrews 12:2). In that context, it means that he has completed our faith, or made it whole if you will. Just prior to that, Hebrews 11 gives an extensive list of Old Testament heroes of the faith and then closes with this sentence in v. 39-40, "And all these, though commended through their faith, did not receive what was promised, since God had provided something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect." Again, the context means that Christ and His work completed them or made them whole. The point is not about being made flawless, but being made whole or complete. And, apart from Christ, we are all lacking something. That goes for Jews, Arabs, Russians, Americans, Mexicans, etc... We aren't perfect in ourselves, but we are "made perfect" in and through Jesus Christ. Apart from Him, that cannot be accomplished. A Christian's hope is that everyone, all the world, would come to know Christ, and thus be "perfected" through Him. I'm pretty sure that's what Ann Coulter's point was if I recall the gist of the conversation correctly. And, look, I'm not defending her. She says some dispicable things that are unnecessary and uncalled for. People like her, on both sides, aren't helping anything. However, I don't have a problem with the first comment and didn't think it warranted inclusion with the rest.
February 26, 200917 yr I guess it depends on who sees it as to whether or not it is disrespectful 5W. In your opinion it might not be, but in a Jewish persons opinion it might be very disrespectful.
February 26, 200917 yr I guess it depends on who sees it as to whether or not it is disrespectful 5W. In your opinion it might not be, but in a Jewish persons opinion it might be very disrespectful. That's their problem then, because it shouldn't be. I'm not offended, nor do I find it disrespectful when someone tells me that I'm wrong in my religious beliefs. When did we get to the point that we couldn't disagree, have different beliefs, and different opinions without being offended or disrespected?
February 26, 200917 yr That's their problem then, because it shouldn't be. I'm not offended, nor do I find it disrespectful when someone tells me that I'm wrong in my religious beliefs. When did we get to the point that we couldn't disagree, have different beliefs, and different opinions without being offended or disrespected? It makes no sense for me to continue with this discussion, because I am not going to change my mind and I assume that you will not either.
February 26, 200917 yr That's their problem then, because it shouldn't be. I'm not offended, nor do I find it disrespectful when someone tells me that I'm wrong in my religious beliefs. When did we get to the point that we couldn't disagree, have different beliefs, and different opinions without being offended or disrespected? :thumb: As soon as hippies had their little movement and in transpired into the "liberals." Now, we have to agree with whatever they say.
February 27, 200917 yr I'll save you the trouble, RM. Here is a list I found in 0.03 seconds. You are quite efficient. I can only aspire.... Thought you were going to look for some, rather than more Coulter? Thought I'd help out. Here's just the top one from my search: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/12/30/more_liberal_hate_speech/ I didn't even have to look for MSNBC, Huffington, Moveon, etc. They're out there on both sides. As I noted when you posted it, those are much more comparable than the first set. I do appreciate that you took the time. Well, there you go rockmom, it took him all of the first hit. Some of the gems from just that one hit: Former Vice President Al Gore referred to GOP activists as "brown shirts." Newsday columnist Hugh Pearson likened the Republican National Convention to the "Nazi rallies held in Germany during the reign of Adolf Hitler." Linda Ronstadt said that the Republican victory on Election Day meant "we've got a new bunch of Hitlers." Chuck Turner, a Boston city councilor, smeared National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice as "a tool of white leaders," like "a Jewish person working for Hitler." Cameron Diaz declared that rape might be legalized if women didn't turn out to vote for John Kerry. Bill Moyers warned a television audience on Election Day that if Kerry won narrowly, "I think there'd be an effort to mount a coup, quite frankly. . . . The right wing is not going to accept it." A cartoon by the widely syndicated Ted Rall described Pat Tillman, who gave up his NFL career to enlist in the Army and was then killed in Afghanistan, as a "sap" and an "idiot." A political flier in Tennessee, depicting Bush as a mentally disabled sprinter, bore the message: "Voting for Bush is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded." The St. Petersburg, Fla., Democratic Club took out an ad calling for the death of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. "Then there's Rumsfeld who said of Iraq, `We have our good days and our bad days,' " the ad read. "We should put this S.O.G. (changed it because I didn't want to violate any rules)up against a wall and say, `This is one of our bad days,' and pull the trigger." Do you want us to go on, or not bother? Have you seen enough proof? I thought you were busy.... Not comparable to Julian Bond saying "[Republicans] idea of equal rights is the American flag and Confederate swastika flying side by side." That's pretty offensive if you ask me. Or Michael Moore insulting ALL Americans? Good thing I didn't search for more than 5 seconds... Lord knows what I would've found. Of course, I'm apparently a liberal, thus an abject failure at all things. Good thing I didn't have time to do my own search. I'd have messed it up royally.
February 27, 200917 yr Actually, no it isn't. That's the problem with cutting and pasting a short excerpt from any conversation. And, applying the wrong definition to a word... The word "perfect" has several definitions, but two specifically apply to this discussion. 1. Lacking nothing essential to the whole; complete of its nature or kind. 2. Being without defect or blemish: a perfect specimen. The Bible tells us that Jesus is the "founder and perfecter of our faith" (Hebrews 12:2). In that context, it means that he has completed our faith, or made it whole if you will. Just prior to that, Hebrews 11 gives an extensive list of Old Testament heroes of the faith and then closes with this sentence in v. 39-40, "And all these, though commended through their faith, did not receive what was promised, since God had provided something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect." Again, the context means that Christ and His work completed them or made them whole. The point is not about being made flawless, but being made whole or complete. And, apart from Christ, we are all lacking something. That goes for Jews, Arabs, Russians, Americans, Mexicans, etc... We aren't perfect in ourselves, but we are "made perfect" in and through Jesus Christ. Apart from Him, that cannot be accomplished. A Christian's hope is that everyone, all the world, would come to know Christ, and thus be "perfected" through Him. I'm pretty sure that's what Ann Coulter's point was if I recall the gist of the conversation correctly. And, look, I'm not defending her. She says some dispicable things that are unnecessary and uncalled for. People like her, on both sides, aren't helping anything. However, I don't have a problem with the first comment and didn't think it warranted inclusion with the rest. Without delving into the religious aspect, I would like to point out, and reiterate, that I don't have either a problem with what Ann Coulter believes, nor do I have a problem with her expressing her beliefs. What I have a problem with is her presentation. I don't even bother to listen to political commentators any more. I don't read them, and I don't watch them on TV. They all sicken me. Some are less offensive than others, on both sides. But to me, they're killing American government. Both sides spew character assinations at the other. Both sides belittle the American public. I'm simply done with all of them. I do think Ann Coulter is among, if not THE worst of the bunch.
February 27, 200917 yr I agree Rockmom. It appears that both sides are looking for the quickest way to insult and marginalize their opponents. It has become very frustrating for people who are truly interested in following the process as there are fewer and fewer outlets where you can get analysis without the garbage.
February 27, 200917 yr You are quite efficient. I can only aspire.... As I noted when you posted it, those are much more comparable than the first set. I do appreciate that you took the time. Of course, I'm apparently a liberal, thus an abject failure at all things. Good thing I didn't have time to do my own search. I'd have messed it up royally. I thought you were Independent?
February 27, 200917 yr Of course, I'm apparently a liberal, thus an abject failure at all things. Good thing I didn't have time to do my own search. I'd have messed it up royally.Admitting it is the first step, don't give up hope, you can beat this debilitating disease.
February 27, 200917 yr Without delving into the religious aspect, I would like to point out, and reiterate, that I don't have either a problem with what Ann Coulter believes, nor do I have a problem with her expressing her beliefs. What I have a problem with is her presentation. I don't even bother to listen to political commentators any more. I don't read them, and I don't watch them on TV. They all sicken me. Some are less offensive than others, on both sides. But to me, they're killing American government. Both sides spew character assinations at the other. Both sides belittle the American public. I'm simply done with all of them. I do think Ann Coulter is among, if not THE worst of the bunch. I agree. But, since I recall the conversation that resulted in the initial comment, I felt like shedding some light on it. I don't think its comparable to the rest. That's all.
February 28, 200917 yr Wait until you get married, have kids and work hard to give them a decent life, you'll see. Yeah, like me. Oh wait, I have a wife and two kids and i am still a liberal. So not like me but like all those other people with a spouse and kids:confused:
February 28, 200917 yr Yeah, like me. Oh wait, I have a wife and two kids and i am still a liberal. So not like me but like all those other people with a spouse and kids:confused:Some grow up and learn, others don't. I have hope for HB.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.