February 20, 200917 yr Explain to me again why Duke is #9 and guaranteed a top 3 seed in the tournament? I'm just not seeing it.
February 20, 200917 yr Explain to me again why Duke is #9 and guaranteed a top 3 seed in the tournament? I'm just not seeing it. It's kind of one of those deals of who would you put in front of them: 21-5 RPI-5 SOS-6 13 quality wins I know what your saying, they just seem to be missing something. But they have a NCAA tourny resume...
February 20, 200917 yr It's kind of one of those deals of who would you put in front of them: 21-5 RPI-5 SOS-6 13 quality wins I know what your saying, they just seem to be missing something. But they have a NCAA tourny resume... Dangit, LCPats...I was hoping for a discussion that didn't bring facts into play. To me, though, those numbers are a bit deceiving. It just seems like they've lost a whole lot lately, and their wins haven't been impressive or over impressive teams.
February 20, 200917 yr Dangit, LCPats...I was hoping for a discussion that didn't bring facts into play. To me, though, those numbers are a bit deceiving. It just seems like they've lost a whole lot lately, and their wins haven't been impressive or over impressive teams. They are 6-4 in their last ten, and their highest RPI win was against Xavier. They have a glaring weakness, it's NO POST GAME.
February 20, 200917 yr ^ I'm guessing that's more like the kind of facts that uk9 wanted to hear... I'm always fond of anti-Duke "facts!":clap:
February 20, 200917 yr Duke played very, very solid tonight, they tried a completely different rotation and set tonight, I liked the way it looked, they made themselves immediately more athletic as a unit. Let's hope this continues...
February 20, 200917 yr Duke played very, very solid tonight, they tried a completely different rotation and set tonight, I liked the way it looked, they made themselves immediately more athletic as a unit. Let's hope this continues... ^ Lets hope tonight was E-Mails coming out party. :thumb: :banana:
February 20, 200917 yr Author St. Johns is a terrible, terrible team... Nope. St Johns is a young, but talented team that plays their tails off every night...
February 20, 200917 yr Nope. St Johns is a young, but talented team that plays their tails off every night... They certainly aren't good by any means.
February 20, 200917 yr St. Johns is a terrible, terrible team... Nope. St Johns is a young, but talented team that plays their tails off every night... I saw a lot of good things from that team....they have the makings of a very solid ballclub.
February 20, 200917 yr Nope. St Johns is a young, but talented team that plays their tails off every night... Doesn't matter if they are young or if they play their tails off, they have a losing record and will end the season with a losing record...
February 20, 200917 yr Author They certainly aren't good by any means. They aren't good yet, but they are far from terrible...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.