:clap:Doc to Duck, now what? Come on, man up and spit it out.

That Don King is looking pretty sharp about now.

1. Elliott

2. Fairview - When healthy!

3. West Carter

4. Rose Hill If they beat Bath, I'll jump them to #4 and drop the others one place.:thumb::thumb:

5. Ashland

6. East Carter

7. Menifee

8. Morgan

9. Bath

10. Greenup

11. Lewis

12. Rowan

13. Fleming

14. Raceland

15. Russell

16. Boyd

 

As promised. Rose Hill is #4!:eyeonyou:

 

I also moved Morgan ahead of Bath, for now.

 

Raceland is playing much better and may soon make a big jump in the poll.

1. Elliott

2. Fairview - When healthy!

3. West Carter

4. Rose Hill If they beat Bath, I'll jump them to #4 and drop the others one place.:thumb::thumb:

5. Ashland

6. East Carter

7. Menifee

8. Morgan

9. Bath

10. Greenup

11. Lewis

12. Rowan

13. Fleming

14. Raceland

15. Russell

16. Boyd

As promised. Rose Hill is #4!:eyeonyou:

 

I also moved Morgan ahead of Bath, for now.

 

Raceland is playing much better and may soon make a big jump in the poll.

 

I think your is right on Duck. I think Ashland and East could go either way. But with the week each had I have no problem with it staying that way. They play each other on the 27th.

Ashland shot very poorly but the open looks were there.:puke::deadhorse:

 

Open looks???? I'm not sure what game u were watching. I pretty much remember "the Heisman" putting on what could have been the best defensive performance to date in the region. If you don't believe me just ask someone else who actually watched the game. Or better yet someone who played.

 

I'd have to agree with "Newman" maybe the players missing the "open shots" were who RH wanted to shoot. HMMM.

 

Just a Thought. My wife says I get one a week.

Top 4 teams in the 16th region comes out of the 62nd district. If you don't see it know you will by the end of Jan....

Edited January 20, 200917 yr by Ram
Rule 13

top 4 teams in the 16th region comes out of the 62nd district. If you don't see it know you will by the end of Jan....

 

Maybe by tournament time but you can not IMO put East and Morgan 3 and 4based on the way they have played so far.

top 4 teams in the 16th region comes out of the 62nd district. If you don't see it know you will by the end of Jan....

 

Last I checked 4 teams can't come out of one district.....only two.

 

Oh well maybe they'll change the rules this year.:idunno:

Open looks???? I'm not sure what game u were watching. I pretty much remember "the Heisman" putting on what could have been the best defensive performance to date in the region. If you don't believe me just ask someone else who actually watched the game. Or better yet someone who played.

I'd have to agree with "Newman" maybe the players missing the "open shots" were who RH wanted to shoot. HMMM.

 

Just a Thought. My wife says I get one a week.

 

 

Done and done, along with someone who coached, someone who announced and several player's parents. I stand by my previous post.:puke::deadhorse:

Last I checked 4 teams can't come out of one district.....only two.

 

Oh well maybe they'll change the rules this year.:idunno:

 

You are right, and I know only 2 teams go, but my point was how strong the 62nd district is, and the only way they would play each other in the region would be in the finals :thumb:

Edited January 20, 200917 yr by Ram
Rule 13

Done and done, along with someone who coached, someone who announced and several player's parents. I stand by my previous post.:puke::deadhorse:

 

Yep, there's 2 solid sources.

1. Elliott

2. Fairview - When healthy!

3. West Carter

4. Ashland

5. East Carter

6. Menifee

7. Rose Hill If they beat Bath, I'll jump them to #4 and drop the others one place.

8. Bath

9. Morgan

10. Greenup

11. Lewis

12. Rowan

13. Fleming

14. Raceland

15. Russell

16. Boyd

 

 

It's funny how everybody else is ranked as to the way they are playing now, but Fairview is ranked based on their potential.

I would think a proper analysis would use the same criteria for all teams.

It's funny how everybody else is ranked as to the way they are playing now, but Fairview is ranked based on their potential.

I would think a proper analysis would use the same criteria for all teams.

 

 

theduckster is always high on Fairview. He rode them all season long last year, without much success I might add.

It's funny how everybody else is ranked as to the way they are playing now, but Fairview is ranked based on their potential.

I would think a proper analysis would use the same criteria for all teams.

 

I don't think there was any basis for duck's rankings other than to put Fairview as high as possible. Rose Hill had to wistle dixie while eating crackers in order to asend.

:idunno: (I like that little guy)

Done and done, along with someone who coached, someone who announced and several player's parents. I stand by my previous post.:puke::deadhorse:

 

Hey Spindoc does Ducky think announcing and understanding are the same words?

 

It's amazing that people don't want to give credit were credit is due.

Bottom line is that Bonner DOMINATED the inside for Ashland and J. Bush DOMINATED Ashlands guard on defense. Why can't people admit this???